statement from park due at 6pm

[BEARGER 1,830]

while their bid is better than ashleys got to say it leaves me very underwelmed.

 

In what way? What were you looking for?

[RANGERRAB 3,653]

while their bid is better than ashleys got to say it leaves me very underwelmed.

 

Neither Kingco or T3B or Ashley have told us how they intend to improve the dross on the park at present.

[compo 7,030]

why not up the stakes and offer 15 million plus two directors of there choosing

[RANGERRAB 3,653]

James Easdale ..... who is this bloke, what does he stand for and represent .... can we get an interrogative tv interview with him where he is asked searching questions ?[/quote

 

They sooner the easdales are gone the better. They are driving supporters away because supporters simply do not want them there as they are not perceived to be acting in the best interests of Rangers.

[trublusince1982 243]

In what way? What were you looking for?

the structure of the deal and especially the amount of cash of actual benefit to the club.

 

would hope whoever takes over puts up the money to take the club forward,not just give enough for two months worth of bills. Personallx want someone incharge who has both the money and ability to steer the ship under their own steam. Not pay the minimum for control then encourage others to fund their leadership.

 

they cannot have any serious plans for infrastructure when they have no idea how much they have to spend.

Edited January 27, 2015 by trublusince1982

[Guest Loyal Shankill]

Yes, and the quicker, the better.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

James Easdale ..... who is this bloke, what does he stand for and represent .... can we get an interrogative tv interview with him where he is asked searching questions ?[/quote

 

They sooner the easdales are gone the better. They are driving supporters away because supporters simply do not want them there as they are not perceived to be acting in the best interests of Rangers.

 

that's putting it very mildly.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

the structure of the deal and especially the amount of cash of actual benefit to the club.

 

would hope whoever takes over puts up the money to take the club forward,not just give enough for two months worth of bills. Personallx want someone incharge who has both the money and ability to steer the ship under their own steam. Not pay the minimum for control then encourage others to fund their leadership.

 

they cannot have any serious plans for infrastructure when they have no idea how much they have to spend.

 

 

you can't put in millions just now the mechanisms for doing so were voted against by greenco at the agm.

[trublusince1982 243]

you can't put in millions just now the mechanisms for doing so were voted against by greenco at the agm.

if you can put in two mil to pay bills you can put in five mil. its the return that restricts.

 

We need people with the ability to drive home whats needed.The bid seems to still rely on the board doing whats right. Its like they are unaware of who they are dealing with.

 

if they want shareholders to follow them at the egm they need to first lead.

Edited January 27, 2015 by trublusince1982

[Blue Moon 1,289]

James Easdale ..... who is this bloke, what does he stand for and represent .... can we get an interrogative tv interview with him where he is asked searching questions ?[/quote

 

They sooner the easdales are gone the better. They are driving supporters away because supporters simply do not want them there as they are not perceived to be acting in the best interests of Rangers.

 

What about Somers and Lambias?