Rangers boardroom battle: Douglas Park consortium winning the battle for Ibrox...

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Because they want 35p

[Mountain Bear 0]

I think the fan minded shareholders would win a vote comfortably if it came to it. They're probably worried about the carnage the current lot could cause in the intervening period though.

 

Better to try and get them to go peaceably if possible IMO.

[Mountain Bear 0]

Because they want 35p

 

Let's call that a 10p premium per share. If the good guys bought another 5% holding from one of them on that basis, it's only an additional £400k (£1.4m against the going rate of £1m).

 

£400k is not to be sniffed at, but every half full home game will cost us the same.

 

Of course GreenCo might say it's all or nothing.

[gisabeer 409]

im sick of the silence. we deserve to know whats going on. Imo they should have called an egm from the offset.

 

lets face it, thats exactly where we're going to end up.

[der Berliner 3,743]

Maybe the RFFF should step in here and make up for the difference ... or do we keep that money dry till the SPFL and SFA do something silly with regards to our license?

[Mountain Bear 0]

Maybe the RFFF should step in here and make up for the difference ... or do we keep that money dry till the SPFL and SFA do something silly with regards to our license?

 

I suspect it will be nearly impossible to get agreement on what to spend it on. Sprucing up Ibrox once ownership is finally sorted out is the only thing I can think of that all parties might agree to.

[chilledbear 16]

Not sure I understand this.

 

'Both the factions vying for control need a long hard look at themselves, I can't believe they've rejected sarver in favour of finding who throws the best crisis loan at us. Fucking sickening.'

 

Why 'both factions' ?

[rfc52 0]

Not sure I understand this.

 

'Both the factions vying for control need a long hard look at themselves, I can't believe they've rejected sarver in favour of finding who throws the best crisis loan at us. Fucking sickening.'

 

Why 'both factions' ?

 

Because I'd imagine both Easdales block and ashley and king/T3B will have rejected sarvers proposal. Therefor both factions.

[trublusince1982 243]

bring back sarver.

[chilledbear 16]

Because I'd imagine both Easdales block and ashley and king/T3B will have rejected sarvers proposal. Therefor both factions.

 

You imagine, aye ok.

 

Who did Sarver blame ?