buster. 5,185 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Sarver leaves the stage but did he ever really arrive ? What a surprise 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 I just hope we don't live to regret this. The guy's credentials were very good and he is successfully running a top U.S. sports team. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Robert Sarver today announces that as a result of the board's failure to provide a counter proposal or to engage in any meaningful negotiations with him, he does not now intend to make an offer for Rangers. This is worrying, but not totally unexpected.... Here was a potential buyer, who has already provided proof of funding, yet the current board didn't even bother entering ANY negotiations. I get the impression that they were never going to accept his offer. In the mean time, the cash reserves are very quickly running out. Hopefully King/3 Bears can pull something oot the hat!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 Bluff made, bluff called. The game moves on..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 what bluff 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 would be interesting to know if the board consulted with Parkco and King as major shareholders on whether this bid would be acceptable or not. I think their response should be made public and their reasons just to remove any doubt that they have sacrificed a potentially better deal for Rangers for the advancement of their own goals. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 what bluff Those two fictitious bids. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 would be interesting to know if the board consulted with Parkco and King as major shareholders on whether this bid would be acceptable or not. I think their response should be made public and their reasons just to remove any doubt that they have sacrificed a potentially better deal for Rangers for the advancement of their own goals. My guess would be that the Easdales had a wee chat with each other & decided that the 26% that they represent would not support the takeover, so rejected it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 i think this guy was genuine enough. perhaps he will have a part to play in our future we certainly need investment and lots of it. that says as bluedell has pointed out it seems likely that he would want to go alone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted January 12, 2015 Share Posted January 12, 2015 My guess would be that the Easdales had a wee chat with each other & decided that the 26% that they represent would not support the takeover, so rejected it. that's is indeed possible, however as they stated they consulted major shareholders then King etc should come out and say whether they were consulted or not.. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.