MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 You wish boy!! :lol: I think in the industry they call it a 'facial' 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Why did Andy in post #396 then state "We've got to be run by Bears" ?? How is that a red herring ? Dammit, someone noticed. I'd have to say I was wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Dammit, someone noticed. I'd have to say I was wrong. On the plus side it created some good debate and a number of posts All good, this is what forums are for. As long as we all realize we all want the same thing - a thriving Club to support - we just have differing views of how to get there. I will readily admit that my will to support Rangers was diminishing with all the mismanagement. but the last 10 days - with the 3 bears, Kind and even Sarver..... has re-invigorated me into seeing light at the end of a very long tunnel. We can but hope 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 At least you had the sense not to publicly suggest a new club might be the only option left....talk about egg on chin scenario. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 We are all Rangers 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 At least you had the sense not to publicly suggest a new club might be the only option left....talk about egg on chin scenario. there's not enough chins in the Hong Kong telephone directory to accomodate all the egg on your face after that post 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Dammit, someone noticed. I'd have to say I was wrong. Didn't mean to 'rat' you Andy. I was on the ropes. :box: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Jackson on twitter The RFC update is there is no update. Park consortium and Sarver camp still awaiting board decision. As you were. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Didn't mean to 'rat' you Andy. I was on the ropes. :box: - we are all good mate. We ALL want the same thing. I know this is highly unlikely but I would be fairly comfortable with all 3 groups - Accident waiting to happen ? Yup. But given the financial input we need I'm not sure we have a single group that could spend even just enough to get us back on an even keel, never mind at the top. The 3 Bears and King could be Sarver's internal watchdog I guess. Optimistic loyal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Jackson on twitter The RFC update is there is no update. Park consortium and Sarver camp still awaiting board decision. As you were. can't help but think the board are stalling for time until Cashley comes up with a new way to screw us over. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.