Steve1872 4 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Rangers have appealed an SPFL tribunal decision to award Neil Alexander £84,000 after he won a breach of contract claim against the club. STV understands the former Ibrox goalkeeper was successful in proving to a panel recently that he was due the money as part of a contractual agreement which the club reneged upon. Alexander, who now plays for Hearts, was due to receive an increase in wages and bonuses if his competitor for the number one jersey, Allan McGregor, left the club. McGregor quit Rangers for Besiktas in 2012 after successfully terminating his contract when it was moved between two companies under TUPE regulation. It is understood Rangers argued that McGregor did not technically "transfer" away from the club given the circumstances. But the tribunal ruled he did, meaning Alexander's contract clause was valid. A date is yet to be set for the appeal to be heard by a Scottish FA judicial panel. Alexander started his fight for the money in December last year, with reports at the time suggesting he may use the civil court to argue his case. http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/303747-scottish-fa-to-hear-appeal-as-neil-alexander-wins-84000-from-rangers/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Fair doos. Every penny out of the ****s pocket is good is it not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Hits coming in from all directions! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,876 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Fair doos. Every penny out of the ****s pocket is good is it not? Not sure I see the logic. It's not going to come out of the director's pockets. they aren't going to be any worse of because of this decision. Perhaps Ashley may need to lend us more but he's not going to lose from it. It will just bring the sale of our assets (players or property) that bit closer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wasp 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 (edited) Not sure I see the logic. It's not going to come out of the director's pockets. they aren't going to be any worse of because of this decision. Perhaps Ashley may need to lend us more but he's not going to lose from it. It will just bring the sale of our assets (players or property) that bit closer. [insults removed] Edited December 17, 2014 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Not sure I see the logic. It's not going to come out of the director's pockets. they aren't going to be any worse of because of this decision. Perhaps Ashley may need to lend us more but he's not going to lose from it. It will just bring the sale of our assets (players or property) that bit closer. I was being a little bit sarcastic mate hence my question mark. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Not sure I see the logic. It's not going to come out of the director's pockets. they aren't going to be any worse of because of this decision. Perhaps Ashley may need to lend us more but he's not going to lose from it. It will just bring the sale of our assets (players or property) that bit closer. If they are losing money hand over fist there will come a time where it just won't be worth their while. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Dude, that's seriously not funny. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Maybe Sooper Salary the wage thief will contribute some of hisI'll gotten gains? :fish: Is there really any need for such silly name calling of the manager? Leave that crap for our enemies who seem to revel in it please. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 (edited) Is there really any need for such silly name calling of the manager? Leave that crap for our enemies who seem to revel in it please. It's got so bad now that our enemies are now calling him Super Ally and Ally the Legend etc etc even singing his name during games. That's the ultimate humiliation. Edited December 16, 2014 by Super Cooper 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.