Jump to content

 

 

Brian Kennedy to reply tomorrow

BEARGER

By BEARGER
in Rangers Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

barca72

barca72 440

Posted
Posted
If they were acting in the interests of all shareholders as they are legally obliged to do then why not?

 

Is there a mechanism whereby the shareholders, other than the institutional shareholders, can meaningfully display their displeasure with the board's actions here?

Other than calling for a vote to replace them.

0
Link to post
Share on other sites
forlanssister

forlanssister 3,114

Posted
Posted
Is there a mechanism whereby the shareholders, other than the institutional shareholders, can meaningfully display their displeasure with the board's actions here?

Other than calling for a vote to replace them.

 

Yes an AGM, but it won't make a blind bit of difference if over 50% of the shareholders are acting in concert.

0
Link to post
Share on other sites
forlanssister

forlanssister 3,114

Posted
Posted
3% interest compared to 0% perhaps? I think that's in the shareholders best interest

 

£45k in interest over six months as opposed to the cost of paying off Graham Wallace, which option do you think's the cheapest and in the best interests of all shareholders?

0
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.