Frankie 8,651 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 From last week: http://t.co/aNmKNADMKG (PDF file) Collyer Bristow settlement confirmed within this. Also, BDO suggest there are £168.7m of unsecured creditors (including £94m noted for the HMRC monies (including the BTC). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Looks like excellent work by BDO so far. Outside of their desire to be very professional however, D&P do give them a fantastic incentive:) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 (edited) 4. The Former Joint Administrators The Joint Liquidators have requested, from the former Joint Administrators, detailed explanations regarding certain aspects of the strategy implemented by them during the Administration. There remains on-going correspondence in this regard. Once full explanations have been obtained, the Joint Liquidators will consult with their legal agents and the Committee regarding what further action, if any, will be required in relation to the matter. Edited November 17, 2014 by the gunslinger 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,729 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 From last week: http://t.co/aNmKNADMKG (PDF file) Collyer Bristow settlement confirmed within this. Also, BDO suggest there are £168.7m of unsecured creditors (including £94m noted for the HMRC monies (including the BTC). where does it say £168.7m of unsecured creditors? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Is Murray the 'third party' covering legals costs on the big tax case? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Is Murray the 'third party' covering legals costs on the big tax case? i would expect so. or rather his company. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 The UTT further agreed that HMRC could appeal to the Court of Session in Scotland, despite Counsel’s arguments that the appeal should be heard in the English Court of Appeal. Why would HMRC prefer the court of sessions....................do they think they'll get a more sympathetic verdict ?....if so, why would they think that ? is this usual ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 The UTT further agreed that HMRC could appeal to the Court of Session in Scotland, despite Counsel’s arguments that the appeal should be heard in the English Court of Appeal. Why would HMRC prefer the court of sessions....................do they think they'll get a more sympathetic verdict ?....if so, why would they think that ? is this usual ? Could be a number of things but I'd guess that it HMRC have a policy of having court proceedings held in the constituent area of the other party (RFC) . It does leave the door open for conspiracy theories though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,149 Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 If there is a conspiracy, the celtic shareholder Lord Docherty sure thing isn't in it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,651 Posted November 17, 2014 Author Share Posted November 17, 2014 where does it say £168.7m of unsecured creditors? Appendix 1 - though some of these will have been paid and may remain on list. Ticketus money still caught up in court action also between Whyte and Octopus. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.