Morgan Stanley increase stake in RIFC to 3.2%

[Rangersitis 0]

I can read, I saw the full list.

 

In the 72 hour period prior to the 200k, how many trades were George's? How many share trades were announced? Then you will have proved Ralston wrong. I do not have to prove anything, I simply asked you to prove the guy had not bought 2.375m in 72 hours. You have not done that yet.

 

The sad thing is, during the last 3 years the most accurate info on the whole debacle has come from the DR + 3 names.

 

Oh, but you have, you really, really have.

[Rangersitis 0]

I can read, I saw the full list.

 

In the 72 hour period prior to the 200k, how many trades were George's? How many share trades were announced? Then you will have proved Ralston wrong. I do not have to prove anything, I simply asked you to prove the guy had not bought 2.375m in 72 hours. You have not done that yet.

 

The sad thing is, during the last 3 years the most accurate info on the whole debacle has come from the DR + 3 names.

 

Based on the LSE list published, the total number of shares traded within the 72 hours prior to the transaction which triggered the announcement was 2,109,768. That also includes that 200,000 trade.

 

Even if all those shares were bought by the one person, there is still quite a shortfall on the 2.375m claim. It really is a moot point, though, as the only person who even mentioned that part of Ralston's article was you.

 

I wouldn't claim that that constitutes proof, but it is the best I can come up with based on what information is out there. I would welcome any input if I have made an error in those calculations.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

talking nonsense sorry