Rangersitis 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Ah triggered it, ok. Since you know everything about this, it is not a move by anyone and it is an insignificant pile of piss, when did this guy buy his other 2.9 odd% ? Give us some hard info rather than just putting down other posters. Share your obviously vast knowledge, some of us are not so fortunate as you. As I have already stated, I gave my opinion on the known facts. If other facts come out, I will then reconsider. You don't appear to have anything new to offer to the thread, so I will leave you to your hypocritical histrionics. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 As I have already stated, I gave my opinion on the known facts. If other facts come out, I will then reconsider. You don't appear to have anything new to offer to the thread, so I will leave you to your hypocritical histrionics. Ok. You just stick to known facts and worries about histrionics. And be careful not to fall off your high horse when sticking it to other posters about some other insignificant shit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 That's how I understood it to be, Frankie. The purchase of 200,000 shares triggered the announcement, yet Ralston has chosen to turn it around the other way. Toxic-esque. We should know better when (or perhaps just if) more notices are posted because given the size of some of the transactions in the past week or so chances are a notifiable holder has pass a threshold. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 We should know better when (or perhaps just if) more notices are posted because given the size of some of the transactions in the past week or so chances are a notifiable holder has pass a threshold. Been a few of a decent size this week. Not me btw. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 We should know better when (or perhaps just if) more notices are posted because given the size of some of the transactions in the past week or so chances are a notifiable holder has pass a threshold. Yes, mate, there have been quite a few big numbers since the departure of Nash and Wallace. I would still class the wording of Ralston's piece as iffy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Yes, mate, there have been quite a few big numbers since the departure of Nash and Wallace. I would still class the wording of Ralston's piece as iffy. Iffy? It's just plain wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Thread title now changed so as to not mislead anyone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Iffy? It's just plain wrong. I was being tactful for a change. I seem to be offending a few sensitive souls. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 I was being tactful for a change. I seem to be offending a few sensitive souls. Stop being an arse mate! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,885 Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Stop being an arse mate! He's been probing on a variety of fronts ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.