the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 It is petulant, and none of what he says is news to anyone who has followed this saga. He has been outmanoeuvred throughout the whole process and has failed to find solutions to surmount the obstacles which were staring him in the face. Yet another damp squib, I'm afraid. Their is only so much anyone can surmount. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Their is only so much anyone can surmount. Agreed, which is all the more reason not to approach it arse about face by using Wallace and Nash, the lamest ducks on a lame duck board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Read that like a call to arms. Battle fever brewing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I think there is a lot to be read from that statement. Ashley's point blank refusal to even acknowledge King shows his arrogance, his total disregard and contempt towards our support and what powers we potentially hold in railroading his investment and merchandise sales in this country. Does he not realise (1) we won't touch his stuff for obvious reasons, (2) The Dhims won't touch his stuff because of the relationship with us, and (3) a mass walkout by the support is a show stopper in itself? I also think the "lack of authority of the Rangers board to make decisions without reference to key shareholders who appear to be “the power behind the throne”. statement is an indicator that he doesn't hold out hope in his dealings with the board. It's not a statement you would make if you still had hope for continued negotiations and diplomacy. It doesn't inspire hope. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Agreed, which is all the more reason not to approach it arse about face by using Wallace and Nash, the lamest ducks on a lame duck board. The board is all place men, lame ducks and monkeys. But you need board approval for any offer. King can probably get board approval easily enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,321 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 We have a lot of work to do over the next few months to regain the club. I would not be here without the support of the fans and neither would my co-investors. We are going to need to draw on your support again over the coming months. I wonder what he has in mind. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,186 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 (edited) I think there is a lot to be read from that statement. Ashley's point blank refusal to even acknowledge King shows his arrogance, his total disregard and contempt towards our support and what powers we potentially hold in railroading his investment and merchandise sales in this country. Does he not realise (1) we won't touch his stuff for obvious reasons, (2) The Dhims won't touch his stuff because of the relationship with us, and (3) a mass walkout by the support is a show stopper in itself? I also think the "lack of authority of the Rangers board to make decisions without reference to key shareholders who appear to be “the power behind the throne”. statement is an indicator that he doesn't hold out hope in his dealings with the board. It's not a statement you would make if you still had hope for continued negotiations and diplomacy. It doesn't inspire hope. Here is a brief general outline of what may be going through the minds of Irvine and Bishop. - Ashely does deal / installs his man or men on the executive board (probably CEO) - Spin campaign regards new era / investment / new players / competing with Celtic at the top / Champions League - ie. Give Hope to those who need to hear it and will want to believe - tangible sweetener to show will and create momentum / possibly a new manager - continued spin / headlines about new players / sell STs and merchandise Therafter - sob stories about players who got away / need for youth followed by the road to no-where................ --------------------------------------------------------------------- ie. They think they can spin enough gulible fans the line to keep the numbers worthwhile for SD. Meanwhile further nurturing the division and creating the 'Real Loyal Bear' who will continue to spend their money. Edited October 23, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I wonder what he has in mind. We will need to force this through or it will never happen. It's a shame more didn't renew but we can still hurt them if they don't do what's right for the club. But will we? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 The board is all place men, lame ducks and monkeys. But you need board approval for any offer. King can probably get board approval easily enough. Yes, he probably can, but he also knew that they were not who he had to do a deal with in order to pull it off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Yes, he probably can, but he also knew that they were not who he had to do a deal with in order to pull it off. The first step is board approval. We both know it will be blocked. So does king but in reality only fan revolt will lead to change and this is vital to show how necessary that is. Up to now we had fans telling us king hadn't offered a penny. Didn't have the cash etc. That's over with. Where we go from here will be up to the fans. Plus there's always the small possibility it will be accepted. It's clearly what we need and good for the club. Most shareholders will see that. Tbh I am not sure what greenco will gain from rejecting it. I doubt Ashley will be paying them off and it's hard to see any cash left in Rangers for them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.