Zappa 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Proof of funds, ironic.....................Sir Duped/CW.......Irvine involvedFit & Proper, ironic........................CW / Easdale..........Irvine involved Not naming individuals, ironic........CG&Co.................Irvine involved The Judas Blogger........................................... .............Irvine involved Ripping the p**h Was there nothing from McLaughlin or Lamont on BBC ? Toxic Jack appears to have been pretty busy because the obsessed village idiot from Donegal is right onto the anti-King/pro-Easdale bandwagon too. Apparently the Easdales are 'real Rangers men' all of a sudden. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Frankie's just retweeted this 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,390 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC "Long statement from Dave King. Will post, but in essence has provided all requested information and is still intent on providing findkng" "Key par" "In any transaction of this nature there are a number of interests to be consulted and considered. "The board has apparently engaged constructively on our proposal while advancing its own points as to what it believes is in the best interest of the club and its shareholders. Sandy Easdale has similarly apparently engaged constructively including highlighting some concerns. I have today responded to these concerns in writing. He will now consult with his co-shareholders and hopefully revert soonest so that we can proceed to agreement and the earliest possible implementation thereof." https://twitter.com/RichwilBBC 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Time to copy the United of Manchester FC thingy - nothing's left of our club if this is all true (see crest stuff on other thread too) I've seen a few Rangers fans suggest that in recent months, but the idea has absolutely no appeal to me. God knows what those Man U fans were thinking. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC · 14s 14 seconds ago Key par: "In any transaction of this nature there are a number of interests to be consulted and considered. Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC · 17s 17 seconds ago "The board has apparently engaged constructively on our proposal while advancing its own points as Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC · 17s 17 seconds ago to what it believes is in the best interest of the club and its shareholders. Sandy Easdale has similarly apparently engaged constructively Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC 19s19 seconds ago including highlighting some concerns. I have today responded to these concerns in writing. Richard Wilson @RichwilBBC 17s17 seconds ago He will now consult with his co-shareholders and hopefully revert soonest so that we can proceed to agreement 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 That sounds better Lgeneral. I see Ill Phil is all over it. The obsesssed piece of shit 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 I've seen a few Rangers fans suggest that in recent months, but the idea has absolutely no appeal to me. God knows what those Man U fans were thinking. Desperate times call for desperate measures. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,390 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Toxic Jack appears to have been pretty busy because the obsessed village idiot from Donegal is right onto the anti-King/pro-Easdale bandwagon too. Apparently the Easdales are 'real Rangers men' all of a sudden. IIINames appears to have 'flipped' a few weeks ago. Now that could be down to one of various possible reasons. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 IIINames appears to have 'flipped' a few weeks ago.Now that could be down to one of various possible reasons. The tims are desperate for GreenCo and their placemen to retain control and hive off more Club assets to Ashley instead of allowing Dave King & co to come in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 Merlin is blogging that the deal is off and King will be offski. Unsurprisingly it reads like Toxic dictated it (down to the mis-spelling of a true fan's name) King Deal Is Off The Table October 23, 2014 / billmcmurdo The proposed Dave King deal at Ibrox has fallen through. No agreement could be reached and it is understood Rangers CEO Graham Wallace couldn’t recommend the proposal to the board without proof of funds, answers to legal questions about SFA and AIM “fit and proper” status in relation to Dave King and a failure to identify Murray and Latham’s backers. There was no meeting in Glasgow as reported by the media and Dave King is believed to be headed back to South Africa. This means that any solution to cash flow issues at Ibrox will have to be found without King’s involvement. Dave King should be commenting shortly to confirm he is out of the picture. Let's hope it is just rubbish from the toxic keyboard of RFC haters Not very prophetic is he. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.