gisabeer 409 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 ashley did invest a shit load of money into newcastle and got his fingers seriously burned (140 million i think) when he brought sam allardyce in. His way of thinking changed somewhat after that and he recouped his losses by any means. the bottom line with Ashley is that should he get control of our club we will become a subsidiary company to Sports Direct. We really do need to get a game plan together and unite against him when push comes to shove. That means a total boycott of everything rangers untill he gets the message 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,664 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 ashley did invest a shit load of money into newcastle and got his fingers seriously burned (140 million i think) when he brought sam allardyce in. His way of thinking changed somewhat after that and he recouped his losses by any means. the bottom line with Ashley is that should he get control of our club we will become a subsidiary company to Sports Direct. We really do need to get a game plan together and unite against him when push comes to shove. That means a total boycott of everything rangers untill he gets the message So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need? And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 I don't think Ashley wants to buy us at all. Who is going to ditch an EPL team for one in the SPL ? newcastle games will be sold to a far wider audience than we could get probably even the CL qualifiers we hope to reach. My gues is his alternative funding will be an interest free loan as long as he gets advertising at Ibrox and the rights to the badge Frankly if the Easdale front goes for this, it tells us what we know already. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need?And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week So why did he buy the HH shares last month instead of putting the money into the club which is desperately short of money? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,664 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 So why did he buy the HH shares last month instead of putting the money into the club which is desperately short of money? To eliminate a potential opponent HH 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,186 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 (edited) So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need?And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week Rab, you really should have learnt by now not to put too much faith into lazy 'financial logic'. I'm no expert in corporate finance and will make my own mistakes but try and learn from them. Edited October 19, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 To eliminate a potential opponent HH How to shoot down one's own argument in a single sentence! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,664 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 How to shoot down one's own argument in a single sentence! HH voted with the reqs at the last AGM. Opponents? Id say so. Not any more theyre not 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 HH voted with the reqs at the last AGM. Opponents? Id say so. Not any more theyre not Keep digging. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,321 Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need?And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week Are people still buying this? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.