Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

You keep saying this.

 

Without control you are literally pissing your money away.

 

Look at Hargreave Hale.

 

And how do you get control? Acquire sufficient shares maybe?

If DK was serious he'd have done this by now but all we've had is one excuse after another for not doing so

Link to post
Share on other sites

brian kennedy i expect. but he was puting in 250k himself and the likes of d park was putting in millions.

 

in the end they would have injected 50 million all in

 

 

Nonsense. We're that the case they would have got the club during administration.

No one would touch the club with a barge pole unless it went newco because of the potential EBT tax bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nonsense. We're that the case they would have got the club during administration.

No one would touch the club with a barge pole unless it went newco because of the potential EBT tax bill

 

An honest admin yes. But the money was to go into the club not the CVA.

 

5 million for the CVA 45 later. Green's proposal in the end was wort 5 million and 16k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see a loan going to an eGM. The repayment of it in shares would of course.

 

That muddies the waters further.:(

 

Something tells me that this is the last throw of the dice. If it fails Ashley will pump in some money via loan and tighten his grip with little benefit. No share issue for others to invest either. All IMO of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where has there been an option to get a controlling share while putting money into the club?

 

He would have to get a shareholding first. He is not prepared to do that therefore he cannot invest this mythical 16million or 30 million or 50million or whatever it is.

All of these so-called great Rangers men got their chance to put their money in but refused to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That muddies the waters further.:(

 

Something tells me that this is the last throw of the dice. If it fails Ashley will pump in some money via loan and tighten his grip with little benefit. No share issue for others to invest either. All IMO of course.

 

yup seams quite likely. they may have a share issue for ****s at a cheap rate as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He would have to get a shareholding first. He is not prepared to do that therefore he cannot invest this mythical 16million or 30 million or 50million or whatever it is.

All of these so-called great Rangers men got their chance to put their money in but refused to do so.

 

 

then why are the board talking to him if he can't

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.