BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 The other big question is what do HH see coming that they will take such a huge hit. It's known as risk control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 It's known as risk control. Yeah and what's the risk....... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 I imagine that those aligned with Greenco control more than that and are consolidating. Green and Ahmad were in discussion about investment on Wednesday morning and a certain Mr Easdale is also in the frame (allegedly). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Yeah and what's the risk....... That the shares fall further. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 It's not strange at all. If he wants to gain control of the Club he is far better taking out another investor, plenty of time to invest his millions once he has control. I suspect he'll have paid somewhere between 0.2% and 0.5% plus stamp duty, petty cash for him anyway. There is no way whatsoever that it had anything to do with that particular investor voting the wrong way at the last AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Wallace's departure would be no great loss. Yet another convenient patsy happy enough to lie and deflect in exchange for a large wedge. It would cost at least £300k. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 There is no way whatsoever that it had anything to do with that particular investor voting the wrong way at the last AGM. Might be but I think it's easy to read too many conspiracy theories into this; it might just have been a straightforward investment decision. He may well have given his broker instructions to buy at 20p up to his 10% SFA limit in the short term. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Might be but I think it's easy to read too many conspiracy theories into this; it might just have been a straightforward investment decision. He may well have given his broker instructions to buy at 20p up to his 10% SFA limit in the short term. Please forgive me for being cynical where the likes of Ashley is concerned, but as has previously been pointed out, if it was purely an investment decision, he could have acquired his ten percent through the open offer. This was strategic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 It would cost at least £300k. That sort of thing is outwith the control of any of us. If he stays on he will still be stealing a wage, so I fail to see a lot of difference. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Just to put things in context, he has just forked out £33m for another 5% stake in Debenhams. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.