Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I read various hints in the main stream wondering how long Graeme Wallace would be with us. Now I see from a very unreliable source (and Rangers hater) that he's on "gardening leave" and was only wheeled out for a photo op at Kirkaldy. Apparently he contacted Dave King a few weeks ago and is now on his way out. Nash has been filling in.

Is it true ?

Are there consequences we should be preparing for ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right that the source is very unreliable because he gets a lot more of the rumours and information he's spreading wrong than he cares to admit.

 

That said, he does sometimes get things right and have certain information before we do, so he can't be completely dismissed in the same way that McMurdo can't be completely dismissed either.

 

These guys sometimes do spread solid info as opposed to their daily dose of innuendo and nonsense.

 

Interestingly, they've both been sort of on the same page recently regarding Wallace, so either they're being fed information from the same source or one of them is pinching scoops from the other and embellishing the facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its 3 names. He hasn't had a thing right in years. Since whyte left in fact.

 

He obviously has a source(s) within the club and of late close to what is going on.

Some of the stuff he has been saying this year has been accurate.

 

He is overly anxious to be seen as the 'main NUJ man' bringing daily exclusives and tends to go out on a limb and throw what seems to be everything out there which in a fluid situation will come back and bite you at times.

 

The other issue to consider is the reliability and agenda of a particular source.

He's been given some bum steers at times (or made them up) but then the rumour is that one of his sources was/is Imran Ahmad.

 

IMO the best way of keeping track is too consider all of what is out there, who is putting it out there regards previous record, listen to anyone you might know yourself, personal interpretation/experience of saga.....put it in a mixer and reach conclusions/theories of your own.

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right that the source is very unreliable because he gets a lot more of the rumours and information he's spreading wrong than he cares to admit.

 

That said, he does sometimes get things right and have certain information before we do, so he can't be completely dismissed in the same way that McMurdo can't be completely dismissed either.

 

These guys sometimes do spread solid info as opposed to their daily dose of innuendo and nonsense.

 

Interestingly, they've both been sort of on the same page recently regarding Wallace, so either they're being fed information from the same source or one of them is pinching scoops from the other and embellishing the facts.

 

Zap there is one persons who's been close to everything at the club, from Murray to Whyte to Green and now the Easdale's. He uses information like a weapon and is not afraid to use anyone from either side of Glasgow, to use this weapon imo? Toxic little runt what he is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zap there is one persons who's been close to everything at the club, from Murray to Whyte to Green and now the Easdale's. He uses information like a weapon and is not afraid to use anyone from either side of Glasgow, to use this weapon imo? Toxic little runt what he is

 

Toxic Jack's brand of PR is like an industrial fertiliser spreading machine spraying shit all over the place. He doesn't care where it lands as long as it reaches most of the right places.

 

PS - Yes, it wouldn't surprise me if Bill & Phil (the flowerpot men?) are both getting a lot of their info from Irvine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Toxic Jack's brand of PR is like an industrial fertiliser spreading machine spraying shit all over the place. He doesn't care where it lands as long as it reaches most of the right places.

 

PS - Yes, it wouldn't surprise me if Bill & Phil (the flowerpot men?) are both getting a lot of their info from Irvine.

 

Like the branding.

 

The sad thing, is that for me Bill is the worse of the two.

With 3names, you get what you expect but with McMurdo, he is shitting on his own doorstep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.