Share issue/open offer news

[buster. 4,957]

My thoughts are well in order thank you though a trifle "up" from tonights performance.

 

 

Good to hear, just joking !!

 

Will better football fill up Ibrox again back to previous levels (40K+) ?

[BrahimHemdani 1]

i though we had raised 4 but was mistaken. tbh i got it in my head it was all or nothing for this issue.

 

If we had raised £4m then the costs would have been 9.25%.

 

If it had been nil raised because the threshold was not triggered then of course the costs would have been £370,000 for nothing, which is an infinitesimal percentage.

 

But it just goes to show that even you young ones can mistakes

[BrahimHemdani 1]

we are down way more than 10000

 

Average attendance is down 10,000 give or take.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

So whose job is that to fix? Loyalty can only go so far.

 

I have put it to the Club that they have missed an enormous marketing opportunity this season and that is the directors responsibility.

 

That said, as you know I do not agree with boycotts because (a) I do not think they will achieve the objective of those who promote them; (b) they harm the Club not the Board as such and © they adversely affect the team by reducing the (Rangers) atmosphere.

 

Equally every fan is a paying customer and entitled to make their own decision.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Average attendance is down 10,000 give or take.

 

give or take several thousand.

 

your also being generous to yourself using average attendance given the opening game anomaly.

 

take out the highest and lowest for each season then average.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

Good to hear, just joking !!

 

Will better football fill up Ibrox again back to previous levels (40K+) ?

 

It will certainly not do any harm.

 

If we are top of the league and playing attractive, goal scoring football, it will encourage fans to come back; especially in the second half of the season if there is an exciting run in.

 

But I wouldn't pretend for a minute that it would be a panacea.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

If we had raised £4m then the costs would have been 9.25%.

 

If it had been nil raised because the threshold was not triggered then of course the costs would have been £370,000 for nothing, which is an infinitesimal percentage.

 

But it just goes to show that even you young ones can mistakes

 

we got 3 million i thought that was out of 4. 25%

 

my match is good. my comprehension poor

[Rangersitis 0]

Equally every fan is a paying customer and entitled to make their own decision.

 

The ones who decide not to go, are they paying customers?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

The ones who decide not to go, are they paying customers?

 

potentially.

[buster. 4,957]

It will certainly not do any harm.

 

If we are top of the league and playing attractive, goal scoring football, it will encourage fans to come back; especially in the second half of the season if there is an exciting run in.

 

But I wouldn't pretend for a minute that it would be a panacea.

 

What would be required to get as close to a "panecea" as possible ?