UOF Statement (10/9/14

[forlanssister 3,114]

Martin Ross @martingrantross · 15m

What is the involvement of Rafat Rizvi, wanted by Interpol, with Glasgow Rangers & does he own shares? Enlighten the fans @RangersFC !!

[buster. 5,261]

Martin Ross @martingrantross · 15m

What is the involvement of Rafat Rizvi, wanted by Interpol, with Glasgow Rangers & does he own shares? Enlighten the fans @RangersFC !!

 

Do his youth players play on a Blue Pitch or drink Margaritas with the Ahmads of this world ?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

The uof are going to poll members on calling a boycott.

 

It's time for a boycott imho

[Frankie 8,665]

The uof are going to poll members on calling a boycott.

 

It's time for a boycott imho

 

A boycott is all well and good but an alternative has to be shown at the same time.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

A boycott is all well and good but an alternative has to be shown at the same time.

 

I am not sure that's the uof domain. But running us properly without convicted fellons involved may be one alternative.

[Frankie 8,665]

I am not sure that's the uof domain. But running us properly without convicted fellons involved may be one alternative.

 

Of course it's their domain. You can't apply pressure in this way with offering alternatives and/or solutions for positive change.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Of course it's their domain. You can't apply pressure in this way with offering alternatives and/or solutions for positive change.

 

then honest running of us would be no doubt the alternative. running us to be successful.

 

we have amply qualified people to do so in place yet it never happens.

 

we are a club who signed 6 players in the summer yet doesn't have the cash to pay them in september. we have s easdale lying to us at every turn. then we have the board turning down tens of millions.

 

we either fund lying and abysmal running or we don't there is your alternative.

[buster. 5,261]

Of course it's their domain. You can't apply pressure in this way with offering alternatives and/or solutions for positive change.

 

You can and in our case it's possibly the only way to offer a chance of longterm prosperity.

 

It's a gamble of course but if you are going to die and/or fade away anyway, perhaps it's one of very few options that give us a chance.

 

 

This gets to the root of sp.iv strategy.

Tie-in the Blue Pound (BP) with both keeping the club from another insolvency event (for the time being) and allowing sp.ivs to cream off said BP, ie. effectively a sp.iv tax for life.

[Frankie 8,665]

then honest running of us would be no doubt the alternative. running us to be successful.

 

we have amply qualified people to do so in place yet it never happens.

 

we are a club who signed 6 players in the summer yet doesn't have the cash to pay them in september. we have s easdale lying to us at every turn. then we have the board turning down tens of millions.

 

we either fund lying and abysmal running or we don't there is your alternative.

 

If we don't fund club (whatever board or owner) the club enters administration.

 

That's what the UoF are advocating here. That's all well and good IF such a process can be guaranteed to deliver a long term change in its fortunes but that's far from certain so it's a very high risk strategy. Perhaps the only strategy but high risk and unlikely to be popular.

[Rangersitis 0]

Of course it's their domain. You can't apply pressure in this way with offering alternatives and/or solutions for positive change.

 

Is that not the responsibility of those who will no doubt be against any call for a boycott? The status quo is certainly not the answer.