Buy Rangers

[Hildy 0]

The video -

[barca72 440]

The video -

 

No thanks, don't trust the RST.

[plgsarmy 111]

No thanks, don't trust the RST.

 

Now why would that be?

[Frankie 8,562]

Another excellent video...

[SteveC 150]

But we are right back into inter-fan fall-out territory. Oh, to have a unified fan base.

[Tannochsidebear 2,405]

Any vehicle that brings more shares into genuine Rangers supporters hands, closer to the point where we can have a worthwhile say in our club's affairs, or able to veto the sale of our Stadium, is to be welcomed.

 

While we all have the right to have our say on the pros and cons of all things Rangers, negative comments that are hardly new and are only there to attempt to adversely affect a share purchase vehicles success, surely must be avoided at this oh so important time in our club's existence.

 

I would refer back to the old saying, never more apt for things like this, that if you don't have anything good to say, say nothing.

 

Anything else is deflection tactics from the main point of the thread, not a contribution to it.

[Rangersitis 0]

Any vehicle that brings more shares into genuine Rangers supporters hands, closer to the point where we can have a worthwhile say in our club's affairs, or able to veto the sale of our Stadium, is to be welcomed.

 

While we all have the right to have our say on the pros and cons of all things Rangers, negative comments that are hardly new and are only there to attempt to adversely affect a share purchase vehicles success, surely must be avoided at this oh so important time in our club's existence.

 

I would refer back to the old saying, never more apt for things like this, that if you don't have anything good to say, say nothing.

 

Anything else is deflection tactics from the main point of the thread, not a contribution to it.

 

Tell me, how did that work out for you when Whyte and Green's mob were doing their plundering?

 

I do realise that this is a vastly different scenario, but as it is a discussion board, it doesn't seem right that you should be telling folk to keep their thoughts to themselves.

[Hildy 0]

But we are right back into inter-fan fall-out territory. Oh, to have a unified fan base.

 

We even have two singing sections. They tried to be together but it didn't work out.

 

What we are seeing within the support is growing factionalism. We look at the board and criticise it, but the Rangers support must look at itself too.

 

The crisis of the last few years has shown us to be a completely dysfunctional club, but maybe we have the club we deserve. When we look at ourselves, we have hardly covered ourselves in glory.

[buster. 5,183]

We even have two singing sections. They tried to be together but it didn't work out.

 

What we are seeing within the support is growing factionalism. We look at the board and criticise it, but the Rangers support must look at itself too.

 

The crisis of the last few years has shown us to be a completely dysfunctional club, but maybe we have the club we deserve. When we look at ourselves, we have hardly covered ourselves in glory.

 

I think you touch upon SDM/Jack Irvines most telling legacy which has since been carefully nutured by all the 'usual suspects' alongside 'el toxico'.

[Rangersitis 0]

We even have two singing sections. They tried to be together but it didn't work out.

 

What we are seeing within the support is growing factionalism. We look at the board and criticise it, but the Rangers support must look at itself too.

 

The crisis of the last few years has shown us to be a completely dysfunctional club, but maybe we have the club we deserve. When we look at ourselves, we have hardly covered ourselves in glory.

 

Hildy, you posted the link to a Buy Rangers video in a Rangers First thread. Don't you think that that could be perceived as being a tad confrontational and lead to increased friction?