buster. 5,263 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 It looks like one member elected to represent the fans is closer to the suits. Whodathunkit? I think that may be a conservative number. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 I think that may be a conservative number. More than likely. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 28, 2014 Share Posted October 28, 2014 It looks like one member elected to represent the fans is closer to the suits. Whodathunkit? You really don't know what you're talking about there (not unusually). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Who chaired the meeting and who took the minutes? As stated on Rangers web site Rev Stuart MacQuarrie, the Chair of the Nominations Committee chaired the first meeting of the RFB and he also took the Minutes, although apparently another member (not me) submitted notes taken at the meeting. Revised Draft Minutes have now been issued to the members for approval. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 You really don't know what you're talking about there (not unusually). Have I misquoted someone? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 As stated on Rangers web site Rev Stuart MacQuarrie, the Chair of the Nominations Committee chaired the first meeting of the RFB and he also took the Minutes, although apparently another member (not me) submitted notes taken at the meeting. Revised Draft Minutes have now been issued to the members for approval. So the meeting was controlled by an unelected person? Hmm. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted October 29, 2014 Author Share Posted October 29, 2014 So the meeting was controlled by an unelected person? Hmm. That may have been because they were voting for office-bearers? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 That may have been because they were voting for office-bearers? That was the original intention. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Have I misquoted someone? Nah but you're making up your own meaning from it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 You really don't know what you're talking about there (not unusually). Bit ironic STB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.