Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Which of course are utter bastions of journalistic integrity and accuracy. If this were false there would have been a clear denial by the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Which of course are utter bastions of journalistic integrity and accuracy. You used this line in the past and it came back to bite you on the arse. Best you get yourself some posterior protection. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 You used this line in the past and it came back to bite you on the arse. Best you get yourself some posterior protection. Im glad you appear to be keeping such a meticulous record of my posting history. But you see when one is in a commercial deal with Celtic FC, and is running stories about Van Donkey being "cheated out of titles" due to EBT's despite the fact they were not in operation during his tenure at Celtic, as well as the previous editor (Rennie) trying to recruit those fine chaps responsible for the RTC for a regular column, And the other runs sensationalist documentaries which lack balance and objectivity, publish details of confidential tax dealings of our club which was evidence stolen from the Tax tribunal, continually refer to our club as "new" until the BBC Trust had to adjudicate otherwise, allows its presenters a platform for their own personal hatred of Rangers, Then yes...I will treat anything they say with a considerable pinch of salt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 If this were false there would have been a clear denial by the club. In that case SBS you have far more optimism in the ability of our current board than I do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Im glad you appear to be keeping such a meticulous record of my posting history. But you see when one is in a commercial deal with Celtic FC' date=' and is running stories about Van Donkey being "cheated out of titles" due to EBT's despite the fact they were not in operation during his tenure at Celtic, as well as the previous editor (Rennie) trying to recruit those fine chaps responsible for the RTC for a regular column, And the other runs sensationalist documentaries which lack balance and objectivity, publish details of confidential tax dealings of our club which was evidence stolen from the Tax tribunal, continually refer to our club as "new" until the BBC Trust had to adjudicate otherwise, allows its presenters a platform for their own personal hatred of Rangers, Then yes...I will treat anything they say with a considerable pinch of salt.[/quote'] You can trot out all the examples you like, there is nothing there that hasn't been commented on previously, but total dismissal of what they report is an act of folly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 You can trot out all the examples you like, there is nothing there that hasn't been commented on previously, but total dismissal of what they report is an act of folly. Im not dismissing it - but I would not use either of those organisations as a credible source regarding our club given their respective history. The only thing that surprised me about that story was that Green actually charged him a quid. I doubt there has been a more vulgar, profiteer in the history of our club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Im not dismissing it - but I would not use either of those organisations as a credible source regarding our club given their respective history. The only thing that surprised me about that story was that Green actually charged him a quid. I doubt there has been a more vulgar' date=' profiteer in the history of our club.[/quote'] I agree that their story shouldn't be taken as Gospel, but it becomes a damn sight more credible when combined with all the other evidence over the last two years, the strange timing of Easdale's request for an interview and the subsequent lack of denials coming from Wallace & co. We are in complete agreement on Green. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Wallace won't survive trying to do what's right for rangers . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 4,007 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Wallace won't survive trying to do what's right for rangers . Does he know what's right? He should have begun cutting costs long ago. It even seems to be he is either unwilling or unable to do this 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 Does he know what's right? He should have begun cutting costs long ago. It even seems to be he is either unwilling or unable to do this nor is he able to raise 30 million or allowed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.