Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

There is still no guarantee that they will get the required number of votes to launch another share issue. Things should become clearer once the updated percentages are revealed.

 

I think they will this time because the major investors don't want to put up any more cash but at the same time they know it's needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would have to offer for all the rest of course but that would probably mean you get the Club lock stock and barrel for less than £20m.

 

That really doesn’t sound very appealing considering the amount that needs to be spent on the stadium upgrades, a proper youth development programme, installing a scouting network, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they will this time because the major investors don't want to put up any more cash but at the same time they know it's needed.

 

Needed or not, even the slowest of the slow will be starting to see that it's a financial black hole they've invested in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That really doesn’t sound very appealing considering the amount that needs to be spent on the stadium upgrades, a proper youth development programme, installing a scouting network, etc.

 

Especially when any prospective owner knows what Green & co paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, nowt!

 

Let's put it this way, the initial GreenCo 'investors' (some of whom may or may not have gotten most of their money back very quickly via IPO cash) paid the administrators £5.5 million for the whole shooting match. They shortly afterwards claimed it had cost them well over £10m, but given Green's propensity for telling porkies, that seems far-fetched.

Link to post
Share on other sites

100 million at 10p then 400 million more to put the other 40 in and greenco would be suitably margionalised

 

Even just the prospect of the dilution a new tranche of 100 million shares would cause must be a frightening prospect for some of the investors who didn't expect to lose their money within 2 years. It's not a prospect the fan ownership groups like BR & RF will be relishing either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even just the prospect of the dilution a new tranche of 100 million shares would cause must be a frightening prospect for some of the investors who didn't expect to lose their money within 2 years. It's not a prospect the fan ownership groups like BR & RF will be relishing either.

 

Or we could go down the same route as the east end and set up an entirely new company. That would mean we'd have one club two companies(they have three companies one club).

A possibity?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.