Lee Robinson signs

[BEARGER 1,830]

http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/7532-lee-signs-season-long-deal

[the gunslinger 3,366]

hard to see how this is not a total waste of cash.

[Zappa 0]

I thought we were talking to him about a short term deal, but he's signed for the whole season?

[Rangersitis 0]

I thought we were talking to him about a short term deal, but he's signed for the whole season?

 

McCoist won't allow anyone to get in the way of a Challenge Cup triumph.

[pmu 0]

Scotland U21 squad 1 x rangers player. Hearts x 3 including their third choice keeper. We spend money i doubt that we have on this. Its a fucking joke. No its actually a crime!

[craig 5,199]

Complete waste of money. Either that or it is just poor signing policy - and by that I mean, if Robinson was "one to watch" then we should have considered bringing him in instead of re-signing Simonsen (I assume we actually have re-signed Simonsen).

 

The need for 3 keepers at this level, without one of them being a youth or U20, is negligible. A true "belt and braces" approach. I think most fans would have been OK had we said "we could do with a 3rd keeper but given the financial position, and that Cammy will only be out a couple of weeks, we will risk no injury to our back-up keeper".

 

To sign a 3rd keeper is nonsense.

 

The whole regime at Rangers, from top to bottom (I exclude the youth department as I know a lot of good people there who DO have nothing but the best interests of the club at heart - well, ok, I exclude the youth dept except for Sinclair), needs to just GTF and let this Club step from under the clouds it is perennially struggling beneath.

[Zappa 0]

(I assume we actually have re-signed Simonsen).

 

Yes, we signed him for the full season again.

[Super Cooper 0]

My goodness. How much longer do we need to put up with this rubbish.

[simplythebest 0]

We just never learn

[jhunter 0]

Are we being told the truth with regards to cammy bell's injury?