the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 It's because Ally just took the salary offered he didn't award it himself. A clear distinction. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Black also isn't a **** just an overpaid poor footballer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 It's because Ally just took the salary offered he didn't award it himself. A clear distinction. Really? Fair enough. I am still trying to work out McCoist's cunning stunt when he cut his pay for a bit then wanted it back up and back dated on the quiet, without letting those pesky fans know. Not bad for someone who said he did not know what he got paid every month to begin with:confused: What about McCoist's corporate rape of the club then, which surpassed our old pal Stockbridge? Different as well I suppose? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Ally's wage is the boards fault. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 If i was Rangers manager i would not have had the brass neck to take us down 4 divisions and keep the same salary i had in the top league. I would have demanded talks with the board to decrease my salary accordingly, but that is just me. I love my club. If i was financially comfortable i would have worked for as long as needed at the club i love for nothing and not asked for any deferral. But then if i was making such a c*nt of such an easy job i would probably have been the bigger man and done what is best for the club and simply walked away anyway. But that is just me. Rangers daft with blue blood and a blue nose. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 He's paid far to much. He should have taken a wage cut. He shouldn't be there he's not good enough. But he's also nothing like the ****s imho. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 He also did work for nothing for a while and has taken a cut. Though it's probably a deferral. I also have to say if I saw what green was up to I would take every penny I could get in wages and shares. Though I would set it as side to reinvest when we have the right owners. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 He also did work for nothing for a while and has taken a cut. Though it's probably a deferral. I also have to say if I saw what green was up to I would take every penny I could get in wages and shares. Though I would set it as side to reinvest when we have the right owners. He should have quit and then outed them. The club needed that, the fans needed that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Quite possibly 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Your defence of McCoist, a Rangers playing legend, is admirable. But many of the points you raise are long before and nothing to do with the Greenco mob I pitch McCoist up with, Is that for added brownie points? Where you finish up re the McCoist being BPH and MH is pathetic. Did McCoist stay and not walk away? Did McCoist tell fans he could not ask them to buy STs when Greenco were not even started? Did McCoist change his mind within a few weeks because Greenco were the second coming, even though many had seen through them? Did McCoist coincidently get offered and accept 1,000,000 70p shares for 1p each? Did the Rangers supporters pay 70 times what McCoist did for his shares in the company Does McCoist hold more corporate rape shares than the devil incarnate Stockbridge? Did McCoist cut his pay for a short spell during the admin exit period as a pr stunt? Did McCoist then ask for it to be re-instated and back dated so it was no cut at all and he maintained his salary level? McCoist certainly did not walk away. He sold his soul to get his nose in the corporate trough with Green, Ahmed, Stockbridge and the rest. He absolutely did not walk away. You are not very good at reading, are you? If you were, you'd have read how I pointed out that he's an awful judge of character. He backed Green after seeing his plan and investors. I know Rangers fans who done the same that are helluva lot more qualified to cast judgement on business plans than Ally ever will. If I took a pay cut on the basis it'd be back dated or reinstated after a set period, I would have taken it. Expecting the manager, who is struggling to manage his players, to know how things are going, or going to go with finances is just daft. It's almost as if you're blaming him for our current troubles. He's a shite manager. He picks a team and does what is in his contract. Sadly, Ally is not very good at his job and is in denial. Anyway, I'm not going any further here. You're lumping McCoist in with corporate rapists.....I'm not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.