the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 "In this instance they demonstrated their lack of integrity for no advantage as I had already, as part of my frank discussions with the fan groups, advised them that I had no prime ambition to invest further in the club but will do so if no other investors come forward. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 you understand the meaning of the word prefer right? as in i would prefer not to go into work tomorrow. Yes, GS, I do undertsand that thanks. However, I assume YOU are going in to work tomorrow....... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 "In this instance they demonstrated their lack of integrity for no advantage as I had already, as part of my frank discussions with the fan groups, advised them that I had no prime ambition to invest further in the club but will do so if no other investors come forward. So at one and the same time according to the UoF "he has indicated that he is willing to provide that investment by taking a lead role in a fan-based initiative and we are fully supportive of the terms on which he wishes to do so." but according to him he has "no prime ambition to invest further in the club"/would "prefer" not to? Doesns't sound to me that he's all that enthusiastic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 Yes, GS, I do undertsand that thanks. However, I assume YOU are going in to work tomorrow....... yet you don't assume he offered them the cash he has freely spoken about offering. much as i would prefer not to go i will indeed be going. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 So at one and the same time according to the UoF "he has indicated that he is willing to provide that investment by taking a lead role in a fan-based initiative and we are fully supportive of the terms on which he wishes to do so." but according to him he has "no prime ambition to invest further in the club"/would "prefer" not to? Doesns't sound to me that he's all that enthusiastic. but will do so if no other investors come forward. i don't need my money to be enthusiastically raised. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 yet you don't assume he offered them the cash he has freely spoken about offering. much as i would prefer not to go i will indeed be going. I think that if experience of the Rangers saga has taught us anything it is that it's best not to "assume" anything. And that's the point. You ARE going to work; much as he prefers not to invest in Rangers, will he eventually come up with the readies (or even a plan, which as Frankie points out is still noticeable by its absence) or will he say, I'm staying home? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 I think that if experience of the Rangers saga has taught us anything it is that it's best not to "assume" anything. And that's the point. You ARE going to work; much as he prefers not to invest in Rangers, will he eventually come up with the readies (or even a plan, which as Frankie points out is still noticeable by its absence) or will he say, I'm staying home? we both know hes not going to get the chance while greenco remain in control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 we both know hes not going to get the chance while greenco remain in control. Quite so, which is convenient for him from a financial point of view and for your argument. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 Quite so, which is convenient for him from a financial point of view and for your argument. it is not convenient for him or any other rangers fan who wants us to get back to the top of the pile. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,383 Posted June 22, 2014 Share Posted June 22, 2014 it is not convenient for him or any other rangers fan who wants us to get back to the top of the pile. Well if he's got the wealth you say he has surely he can buy a shareholding which will give him some influence within Rangers. If he increases that shareholding then he'll be in control. There is no other way he can bring about the change you and his army of fans so desperately seem to think he can bring about. Or will the tired old excuse about not lining shareholders pockets be trotted out again? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.