Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I don't see anybody having a go at answering my question, probably they know that my next question would be along the lines of... Why don't the pro board/faceless investors have a rally? Then we could genuinely compare the turnouts.
Probably because there's good number of folk who aren't pro anything, just anti-boycott.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably because there's good number of folk who aren't pro anything, just anti-boycott.

 

Other than for emotive effect, how can someone choosing not to purchase a season ticket be described as being part of a boycott?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's agree that the turnout was 600.

 

Is this figure high or low? Depending on your point of view, it's both. If people don't want to believe that there's a genuine and popular protest from the support, it will be dismissed as a low number. If people do believe that the fans are unhappy, they will claim it is a healthy turnout. The art is in the spinning of the fact as much as it is in the fact itself.

 

One point that might be worth making: leading figures in these protests should be sartorially impeccable. The Rangers support is obsessed with suits and collars and ties. Leaders or spokespeople really have to dress accordingly as their images are seen by more than just those who actually turn up.

 

If the first impression isn't right, the message will be dismissed before it is even heard. It might seem like a small detail, but successful campaigns take care to get the small details right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's agree that the turnout was 600.

 

Is this figure high or low? Depending on your point of view, it's both. If people don't want to believe that there's a genuine and popular protest from the support, it will be dismissed as a low number. If people do believe that the fans are unhappy, they will claim it is a healthy turnout. The art is in the spinning of the fact as much as it is in the fact itself.

 

One point that might be worth making: leading figures in these protests should be sartorially impeccable. The Rangers support is obsessed with suits and collars and ties. Leaders or spokespeople really have to dress accordingly as their images are seen by more than just those who actually turn up.

 

If the first impression isn't right, the message will be dismissed before it is even heard. It might seem like a small detail, but successful campaigns take care to get the small details right.

 

Another point is that it seems as though a good job was done regards letting the media know what was going down and have them come out and cover it.

Hopefully this is illustrated in tomorrows papers.

 

In effect it helps the march/protest to highlight the message to tens of thousands+ of media consumers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.