Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Home > Rangers

Fans set for card protest at Ibrox

 

Published on 24 May 2014

24316183.jpg

Matthew Lindsay

RANGERS fans are set to stage a season-ticket protest at Ibrox this afternoon.

Gers supporters will hand in postcards addressed to chief executive Graham Wallace at the stadium.

The pre-printed cards will outline why Light Blues fans have not renewed their season tickets this summer.

They will call for Wallace to provide them with legal assurances to protect both Ibrox and Murray Park.

The postcards also demand a change of board and ask that "faceless investors" are named and removed.

The protest, which has been organised by the Sons of Struth, follows the breakdown of talks between the Union of Fans and the board.

Sons of Struth organiser Craig Houston said: "This will make a very public visual impact that will let the board and their faceless investors know how they feel."

The union and the board met at Ibrox last Wednesday in an attempt to bring an end to the stand-off over season tickets.

The union claimed the board would meet on Thursday to consider giving them legally binding assurances over the stadium and the training ground.

But in a statement issued last Saturday night the club, who have made a "commitment" not to sell or sell and leaseback Ibrox in the next 12 months, denied that.

Houston this week launched an online petition in response to that development.

It called for Wallace to give written assurances that Ibrox will not be sold or used as security for any loans.

Over 6,500 fans signed up to the petition that was emailed to Wallace and major shareholder Sandy Easdale.

Sheriff officers served Houston with a warning of court action on Wednesday.

 

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/mobile/rangers/fans-set-for-card-protest-at-ibrox-164810n.24313179

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has any club in Britain ever provided legal assurance to supporters to protect their crown jewels? Or actually had the means to do it? As in, have the SoS any sort of idea how such a "legal assurance" should look like to be actually legally binding?

 

Demand a change of board. In what way? Houston's personal vendetta aside, what would they like to change?

 

Faceless investors named AND removed? Now, the much cited faceless investors together own 10% of the club's shares. What exactly is the SoS' chagrin with them? They do understand that certain investors do not want to be named or connected directly, for all sorts of reasons. Not all of them have to be have an - always implied - evil background or plan. The main problem-makers appear to be Laxey and their hedge fund strategies. As for removing them ... what does the SoS reallistically expect the board to do here? Force them to sell their shares?

 

... such are the questions that arise when reading the above. There is no doubt whatsoever in the motives of the SoS and all their good intentions. Yet, you do wonder whether they thought their demands through, as they look somewhat out of reach for board to actually achieve, even if they wanted to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has any club in Britain ever provided legal assurance to supporters to protect their crown jewels? Or actually had the means to do it? As in, have the SoS any sort of idea how such a "legal assurance" should look like to be actually legally binding?

 

Demand a change of board. In what way? Houston's personal vendetta aside, what would they like to change?

 

Faceless investors named AND removed? Now, the much cited faceless investors together own 10% of the club's shares. What exactly is the SoS' chagrin with them? They do understand that certain investors do not want to be named or connected directly, for all sorts of reasons. Not all of them have to be have an - always implied - evil background or plan. The main problem-makers appear to be Laxey and their hedge fund strategies. As for removing them ... what does the SoS reallistically expect the board to do here? Force them to sell their shares?

 

... such are the questions that arise when reading the above. There is no doubt whatsoever in the motives of the SoS and all their good intentions. Yet, you do wonder whether they thought their demands through, as they look somewhat out of reach for board to actually achieve, even if they wanted to.

 

 

hiding your head in the sand wont help.

Personal vendatta? get a grip man

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.