Rangers In Crisis

[RANGERRAB 3,739]

You don't believe that he has produced enough real evidence to cause Celtic harm?

 

When you consider what Swansea City & the Dutch clubs are being investigated for then I'd say it's likely there's more than enough evidence for them to be investigated also

[Rangersitis 0]

You don't believe that he has produced enough real evidence to cause Celtic harm?

 

Wouldn't have a clue. As I stated, he had no credibility after the schoolboy errors in his early offerings.

[Rangersitis 0]

That's still on the go mate. He spends his days having it out with tims on Twitter.

 

Sounds about right.

[Stimpy 0]

Sounds about right.

 

Same reason I unfollowed him too. Seeing RTs of tims which include daft arguments puts questions marks over his credibility. RTC, for as much I hated the cunt, held his own and was more astute in his approach.

[RANGERRAB 3,739]

Same reason I unfollowed him too. Seeing RTs of tims which include daft arguments puts questions marks over his credibility. RTC, for as much I hated the cunt, held his own and was more astute in his approach.

 

RTC. LOL. When will he be getting a knock at the door at 4 in the morning by the other boys in blue do you think?

[Mountain Bear 0]

You said:

 

". . . until expectations are lowered, there will be no let up on the misery front".

 

This would tend to suggest that a lowering of expectations is your recommended course of action.

 

Perhaps you can clear it up - should expectations be lowered - in your view?

 

Happy to clear that up. It was Rangersitis who said that, not me...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mountain Bear 0]

I'm wide awake thanks.

 

I guarantee that the hedge funds will have moved on by then.

 

Our prospects will depend on who owns us long term and how much damage we take in the interim.

 

Being realistic is one thing, being defeatist is something else entirely.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Stimpy 0]

RTC. LOL. When will he be getting a knock at the door at 4 in the morning by the other boys in blue do you think?

 

Sadly never.

[barca72 440]

Wouldn't have a clue. As I stated, he had no credibility after the schoolboy errors in his early offerings.

 

I think you're wrong to dismiss this guy's efforts because of your early cynicism. A lot has been uncovered since then. Here are a few links ...

 

http://footballtaxhavens.wordpress.com/2014/06/19/margaret-margaret-did-celtic-tell-you-there-was-meeting-in-brussels-on-their-eu-state-aid-land-deals-the-day-after-the-wsha-meeting/

 

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=35au33c&s=8#.U6R3G-mmdD8

 

http://footballtaxhavens.wordpress.com/2014/06/20/so-willie-haughey-owns-celtic-park-but-the-question-for-celtic-shareholders-is-why/

 

 

You may wish to avail yourself of the other information on the site before making a statement on something which you admit to having no idea about.

What difference does it make if he winds up a few yahoos on twitter, the investigation by the E.C. is under way using among other exhibits, his information.

Now it turns out that Celtic don't even own the ground upon which their stadium is built (I wonder what their own shareholders feel about that ).

So, I refer you back to my original post to Hildy about Celtic having to possibly deal with " seemingly unlikely scenarios " of their own before they manage to make their flight of fancy.

Depending on the level of gullability and/or corruption of the E.C board, we shall see what Celtic have to deal with.

[Hildy 0]

Happy to clear that up. It was Rangersitis who said that, not me...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My apologies.

 

It was indeed.