der Berliner 3,743 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 Matthew Lindsay @MattLindsayET 9mA baffling statement from Rangers. When was it reported the club had offered legal binding undertakings over Ibrox and Murray Park? All I reported - and saw reported elsewhere - was that Rangers would CONSIDER doing so. It seems to me that this statement is effectively, in a convoluted way, an admission that Rangers WILL sell and leaseback Murray Park. So he did not read that Scotsman article? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,743 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 I'd be fascinated to know why BH trusts the Board. What have they done to earn it ? Matter of fact, I don't think he does. Nor do I, BTW. What is noteable though is that IMHO quite a few people are so much anti-board that this particular abyss has stared back too long at them. Every word is a) ridiculed, b) not trusted and c) scrutinized to the core. To some this may be a way to get forward. It is sure no way for any sort of healthy debate. Not least when all that is out there right now is the board and no tangible alternative plan. IMHO, the current board is a much lesser evil than any board before them. Whether it is any "good" for the club remains to be seen though, and no matter what people say, you can't accelerate time to get an answer to whether it is a "good" board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,184 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 So he did not read that Scotsman article? He is referring to the UoF statement where the word 'consider' was used (including The Scotsman) This was the meat or important part of all reports I saw. If you don't read the statements included in the reports then it explains your confusion or willful blindness. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 The statement is very good spin. No stench of Jack there. The new guy. Our danger is fans believing the spin And that we don't have a better spin doctor ourselves If we had, it would be game on The irony of it all though, is that hiring another spin doctor was one of the biggest PR gaffs this board has made. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,743 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 (edited) He is referring to the UoF statement where the word 'consider' was used (including The Scotsman)This was the meat or important part of all reports I saw. If you don't read the statements included in the reports then it explains your confusion or willful blindness. His first line tells me otherwise. NB: Just in case, the club responded to similar articles as such, not about certain words used in this or that statement. Edited May 18, 2014 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,184 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 His first line tells me otherwise. What was that you said about semantic's ?................Second line then....... He was referring to the board statement in conjunction with the use of the word 'consider' in the UoF statement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 Matter of fact, I don't think he does. Nor do I, BTW. What is noteable though is that IMHO quite a few people are so much anti-board that this particular abyss has stared back too long at them. Every word is a) ridiculed, b) not trusted and c) scrutinized to the core. To some this may be a way to get forward. It is sure no way for any sort of healthy debate. Not least when all that is out there right now is the board and no tangible alternative plan. IMHO, the current board is a much lesser evil than any board before them. Whether it is any "good" for the club remains to be seen though, and no matter what people say, you can't accelerate time to get an answer to whether it is a "good" board. absolutely laughable 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,184 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 Quote Originally Posted by chilledbear View PostI'd be fascinated to know why BH trusts the Board. What have they done to earn it ? Matter of fact, I don't think he does. Nor do I, BTW. What is noteable though is that IMHO quite a few people are so much anti-board that this particular abyss has stared back too long at them. Every word is a) ridiculed, b) not trusted and c) scrutinized to the core. To some this may be a way to get forward. It is sure no way for any sort of healthy debate. Not least when all that is out there right now is the board and no tangible alternative plan. IMHO, the current board is a much lesser evil than any board before them. Whether it is any "good" for the club remains to be seen though, and no matter what people say, you can't accelerate time to get an answer to whether it is a "good" board. DB, in your post quoted above, you state that you don't trust the current board. Could you tell us why ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,653 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 absolutely laughable In what way? Im no great fan of the board wither because Ive yet to hear how they plan to take Rangers back to the top of Scottish football and beyond but until theres a viable alternative we are stuck with what we've got. That means getting the Dave King nonsense out of peoples heads. Despite what he says I simply do not believe he intends to invest a penny. His opportunity arose after the AGM when the reqs got around 30percent each.Had he then bought shares(like Prior and Laxey did)hed be in power by now 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 18, 2014 Share Posted May 18, 2014 we may be stuck with it but we need not back it. either with words or cash. the second part of your post rab is just claptrap. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.