Frankie 8,652 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Can only imagine there will be a fair bit of news today - both from King and the club. PS: BBC Scotland didn't mention Chris' appearance at all on their earlier bulletins this morning. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Not in the least surprised by this development, the wigs and members of the board have a history of deceivement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,761 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Can only imagine there will be a fair bit of news today - both from King and the club. PS: BBC Scotland didn't mention Chris' appearance at all on their earlier bulletins this morning. He's on now 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Just to add on the apparent split/disagreement within the boardroom. If GW was in the middle, will he have to consider his 100% bonus given that the trigger(s) are non-specific and depend on the judgement of the renumeration committee. Remuneration and Nominations Committee James Easdale (Chairman)...................................Blue Pitch / Margarita Norman Crighton...................................................Laxey David Somers...........................................................?? / Note: Was recommended by Daniel Stewarts Ltd who have always been close to Green Graham Wallace (attendee) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 wallace will get sacked. they will call it mutual and he will be paid to stay quiet. it's the pattern. we will then get a new guy who will want time to asses things then blame wallace for the problems. it's a shame because wallace could sort us out probably if allowed to do so. but his job isn't to run us properly its to do what greenco want and make them money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,652 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Chris just suggested that UoF fund sign-ups will compare favourably with possible season ticket renewal figures of around 10-12K. I'd be surprised if the UoF achieved such a high number but we'll see I guess. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 He's on now Just a sitrep that I don't think contained anything new. The stand-off continues. Let's see if today brings any communications from board to UoF. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Chris just suggested that UoF fund sign-ups will compare favourably with possible season ticket renewal figures of around 10-12K. I'd be surprised if the UoF achieved such a high number but we'll see I guess. I think the number that is most important is projected ST's less actual ST's. It will probably need a regulatory notice to tell the markets because of the 'hole' it makes in projected numbers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Chris just suggested that UoF fund sign-ups will compare favourably with possible season ticket renewal figures of around 10-12K. I'd be surprised if the UoF achieved such a high number but we'll see I guess. rather surprisingly i met 3 people in work yesterday who had signed up to it and they aren't the online type bear. it was 3 out of 4 the other having renewed. i was very surprised. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 a worthless exercise indeed lol. We'll see how it pans out, as essentially nothing has changed. For in essence, there is no change of power et al here. The UoF and King played on the uncertainty caused by all the boardroom issues, the AGM, and the 120-review revelations ... and fair enough. Party politics. They played with the - IMHO unfounded - idea that the board may utilize Ibrox or Auchenhowie to get some money (which it categorically denied from day one, back to the early days of Green, mind you) and wanted "security" that no deals about both assets will be struck, or their ST people won't renew. Apparently many ST holders wanted that "security" too and joined up with the KingoCo thing to get that "security". Should the club make some "legally binding" announcement that it won't do any deals for either asset (for next season) and the UoF et al accept that, the actual stand-of between King and the current board is exactly where it was beforehand. IMHO, it may even swing untowards the board, if they can over the course of the summer and next season show that they actually mean business and are able to do it. Only time will tell, either way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.