simplythebest 0 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Green quoted one to McColl. Was extortionate In August though. Sure McColl could have skipped a few SNP donations to help pay it mind you 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 In August though. Sure McColl could have skipped a few SNP donations to help pay it mind you Yeah paying 70 for shares that cost a penny sounds like him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 To be blunt you've got the stick at the shit end. It's not terrifying that we could end up with never ending campaigns of demands, it's terrifying that we have to have them in the first place. People used to say Rangers were only ever two defeats away from a crisis, nowadays we're only ever two months away from oblivion. And that is not because of campaigns, or demands, or Dave Bloody King, it's because of the people who have been and are running our club. Into the ground. We don't have to have them some just believe we have to. When you have a core campaign and you get what you want out of it you shouldn't just start shifting the goalposts end of. You can continue scrutinising the board without the nuclear threat 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Yeah paying 70 for shares that cost a penny sounds like him. He was offered 28% that would have gone a long way 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 By their own principle that should be it, the core purpose of this was to 'safeguard' the stadium and training ground. It was to get security for our season book money actually. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 He was offered 28% that would have gone a long way Yeah for 3 times what it was worth. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Sure McColl could have skipped a few SNP donations to help pay it mind you Did you miss the parts where McColl said several times that he had legal/binding commitments to his business partners that prevented him from investing in other companies? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 We don't have to have them some just believe we have to. When you have a core campaign and you get what you want out of it you shouldn't just start shifting the goalposts end of. You can continue scrutinising the board without the nuclear threat You need to re read the aims of the uof. And certainly this of Rangers 1972 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 By their own principle that should be it, the core purpose of this was to 'safeguard' the stadium and training ground. Would this proposed agreement be worth the paper it was written on if Rangers went into administration or suffered another liquidation event? It might be 'legally binding' but would it be legally binding in every eventuality? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 14, 2014 Share Posted May 14, 2014 Jackpot hildy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.