Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

So far this has been a real disappointment. Sentiment was right but medium completely wrong.

 

This should have complemented an open, minuted meeting. A shame that we are no closer to securing one.

 

He lied on the credit card question. (see post 26)

 

He isn't even very good at lying or covering tracks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can you justify a bonus that your reported receiving?

 

 

 

You didn't answer the question Graham.

 

Surely, based on GW's answer, it's up to the Remuneration committee to justify his bonus???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can it not be a first step?

 

It should be. Will it?

 

I've asked the question politely a few times now and have received no answer. Maybe that says more....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be. Will it?

 

I've asked the question politely a few times now and have received no answer. Maybe that says more....?

 

In a twitter session that will largely have been taken over by tims and Rangers fans only interested in throwing abuse about he was never going to get through everything to be fair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, based on GW's answer, it's up to the Remuneration committee to justify his bonus???

 

I wrote the following on another thread earlier....

 

What I would say is that any bonus paid should have proportional and recognizable value for the club.

That is to say that any contract that contains a bonus clause should clearly state what tangible targets or similar would trigger such a bonus.

 

In the case of Graham Wallace and the 100% bonus we now know that this isn't the case and this IMO is what makes it particularly damaging to the credibility of the individual, the board and the finances of the club.

 

Added to that is the way we have found out, with the club having to be forced by legal means.

It only makes you wonder what else is under the bonnet.

 

ie. A lack of transparency within his contract at a time when it was and is vital.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously decided to go on longer than advertised.

 

.@BoosahWe We are working with everyone potentially impacted to identify if there are any potential alternatives for them.

 

@Boosah We are restructuring areas to better position us for future growth. As part of this, a small number of roles may be affected.

 

 

Boosah @Boosah · 1h

@RFC_Official Why are board bonuses even being discussed never mind taken, when redundancies are happening?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a twitter session that will largely have been taken over by tims and Rangers fans only interested in throwing abuse about he was never going to get through everything to be fair

 

It's very easy to choose good questions (there have been many) and answer appropriately.

 

Those responsible for the RFC Twitter account will know exactly what handles to look out for in that regard.

 

Nevertheless, it's been several months since the AGM with no fan meeting. Shouldn't take a Twitter Q&A to explain this tardiness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.