The Union of Fans Statement

[forlanssister 3,114]

I'm sure they'll give you a torch.

 

Aye but a third party would probably be holding the batteries as security.

[simplythebest 0]

Thank-you for the reply BH.

 

Re. CW

When you say "one of the first" from where or what exactly do you refer ?

As you have brought your criticisms into play, did you restrict them to the RST spokesman or did you take on the task of trying to educate Rangers Media regards Mr.Whyte ?

I ask that because IIRC someone else on here mentioned you were active on RM and the more vocal members on there were very much pushing CW up to his metaphorical "95th minute" as we went into Administration. The same who were so vicifourous in backing Green and his cohorts up to and beyond the recordings being published.

 

Re. CG and chums

You got that very wrong, as did many tbf. (For the record, I called out Green from May 2012, (CW: before he took over).

I'd like to ask a similar question as re.CW, did you try to debate against the pro Green camp on Rangers Media post April 2013 ? If you did it would have been fairly hard work I'd have thought.

 

One of the reasons I ask you these questions is as I said to give me some background as to your record on such matters because you are heavily involved in the debating of club politics. It was to indulge my curiosity, thank-you again for replying.

 

The other more indirect question about other forums or groups was to establish if the forums and/or groups that you may be a member were generally of a similar opinion to yourself both general substance and timescales. I wanted to know if someone who took so much time to back the present board had went against the general opinion held on say RM on the likes of CG.

 

All that said if you turn round and tell me you aren't on RM then I've partly wasted my time !!

 

 

Speaking generally, what disturbs me is that many of the same people who heavily and blindly backed past regimes way beyond 'credible sell-by date even for the gulible' are now backing the present board (not forgetting that many of the shares are still owned by the same people/groups, eg.BPH).....and that I and others I know who were of a similar timely opinion on both CW and CG&Co see the the current board as a danger to the football club.

 

I can't understand why those with such a bad record in such judgement calls can have the gaul to shout so loudly as they venture another and think that fans should be reminded of this.

 

 

ps. I am not a member of any group but have posted on FF.

 

RM is a forum where a variety of opinions are expressed I don't quite get the need to group it all together

[buster. 5,199]

RM is a forum where a variety of opinions are expressed I don't quite get the need to group it all together

 

Whilst there will be differing opinions in just about any group on any subject, there is often one that is more dominant than others.

 

Coming to RM, I am reliably informed that those who tend to be the 'loudest' and what may be regarded the general opinion have been over the piece advocating the qualities of Craig Whyte, Green&Co, Stockbridge & James Easdale mini board and now the current board.

 

I appreciate that there will have probably been a less vocal minority with more sense.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

On the contrary it's crazy to ask for security you know you are not going to get for handing over fans' money for season tickets which would be a purchase (if it was allowed) not a loan at all.

 

If Dave King owned Rangers and next season the UoF turned against him for some reason, and tried the same scheme fronted by someone else, do you honestly think he would give in to it?

 

 

i as i say no matter who owns us there is a tipping point. there is no lawful impediment to giving a third party security so once you reach the tipping point you get it.

 

kings tipping point may be higher or lower than this boards who knows but there will still be one in this or any future senario.

 

if i felt there was a risk to ibrox from dave king i would be all over a scheme to have him hand over security.

[North Rd 0]

@time4change......Green, yeah STB

[the gunslinger 3,366]

And they have quite categorically stated the stadium will not be used as security. You did read that bit?

 

they say all sorts of shite. they are under investigation by the cops for lying.

[simplythebest 0]

I was fairly neutral on Whyte to be honest

[buster. 5,199]

I was fairly neutral on Whyte to be honest

 

So despite the various warning signs for those who cared to look you didn't see the dangers.

 

Did you apply the same level of scrutiny towards CG&Co ?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

So despite the various warning signs for those who cared to look you didn't see the dangers.

 

Did you apply the same level of scrutiny towards CG&Co ?

 

was love at firs sight with green co.

[TheTinMan99 0]

So despite the various warning signs for those who cared to look you didn't see the dangers.

 

Did you apply the same level of scrutiny towards CG&Co ?

 

STB still thinks the sun shines out Green's arse, despite the current CEO literally blaming him for the current woes. He also rather strangely supports the current CEO and board. He's entitled to his opinions, of course. It would just be nice if they made some sort of logical sense.