the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 even super will be better with 50 million than without. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 but really it's the capital we need to save money on loan interest and to get edminson house up and running plus some proper expertise on the board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 even super will be better with 50 million than without. Would you trust McCoist with £50m of your money? A good manager could get as much value with significantly less. In our position, it is vital that we have a good manager. It is completely irresponsible to hand over a generous budget to an ordinary or poor manager. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Would you trust McCoist with £50m of your money? A good manager could get as much value with significantly less. In our position, it is vital that we have a good manager. It is completely irresponsible to hand over a generous budget to an ordinary or poor manager. probably why the board haven't replaced him. he runs great interference for them. king on the other hand would have to worry about his cash being spent wisely. this lot haven't put a penny in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 even super will be better with 50 million than without. Or more dangerous with it 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Pot calling kettle Black is a phrase that comes to mind. My posts should come with a warning of my blindness. Of course everything is ok and we can see exactly the value that has come of the approximate 70M spend all through our scouting, youth and development, the star signings aswell as the long list of improvements to the stadium amongst other things. The extra staff being taken on and the boardroom having earned their generous bonus because of their sterling work in taking our club forward to a better place. You've lost me there 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 regardless of manager we will do better on the park with 50 million of investment than without Are you really sure that McCoist would know where to spend it? And BTW even supposing that King won out and invested £50 million, it wouldn't all be in the team, there's a lot needing done to improve Ibrox and a lot needs invested in marketing as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Are you really sure that McCoist would know where to spend it? And BTW even supposing that King won out and invested £50 million, it wouldn't all be in the team, there's a lot needing done to improve Ibrox and a lot needs invested in marketing as well. Yes we need money for all sorts much of it far more important than the team in truth. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Or more dangerous with it No question the team will win more often though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,663 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 probably why the board haven't replaced him. he runs great interference for them. king on the other hand would have to worry about his cash being spent wisely. this lot haven't put a penny in. 'This lot' haven't put a penny in? The Easdales, Somers and Crichton all own shares. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.