Super Cooper 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Well done Sir, you know who you are. Can these documents be doctored before "Bill" gets a look at them? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Fearsome bear population in Fraserburgh 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 He shouldn't go over to RM at the moment, Tim like behaviour!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 He shouldn't go over to RM at the moment, Tim like behaviour!! Hehe - are they frothing at the mouth in disgust at one shareholder exercising his rights? Btw, I'd encourage all shareholders to do the same as Bily. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,815 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Good job by Mr. Paterson. Not-so-good-job in instantly running to the media and tell all about it. I reckon quite a few will disagree and say everything must be laid open to each and everyone and instantly (a main 21st century addiction and illness), but a) this brings the club (and not just the board) even further into disrepute, and b) I reckon that whatever he finds out won't make it into the public domain (NDA et al, unless it will be info relevant for the annual accounts) anyway. It sure is good if some interested parties and individuals take up their right and check what is going on. But they should do so in a responsible way. If they find something that angers them, you'd hope they do the sensible stuff and ask the club about it, via a EGM or otherwise. But not running to the media and reveal their findings, if any. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Good job by Mr. Paterson. Not-so-good-job in instantly running to the media and tell all about it. I reckon quite a few will disagree and say everything must be laid open to each and everyone and instantly (a main 21st century addiction and illness), but a) this brings the club (and not just the board) even further into disrepute, and b) I reckon that whatever he finds out won't make it into the public domain (NDA et al, unless it will be info relevant for the annual accounts) anyway. It sure is good if some interested parties and individuals take up their right and check what is going on. But they should do so in a responsible way. If they find something that angers them, you'd hope they do the sensible stuff and ask the club about it, via a EGM or otherwise. But not running to the media and reveal their findings, if any. You may well wish to avail yourself of the facts before you libel someone rather than after the fact. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Good job by Mr. Paterson. Not-so-good-job in instantly running to the media and tell all about it. I reckon quite a few will disagree and say everything must be laid open to each and everyone and instantly (a main 21st century addiction and illness), but a) this brings the club (and not just the board) even further into disrepute, and b) I reckon that whatever he finds out won't make it into the public domain (NDA et al, unless it will be info relevant for the annual accounts) anyway. It sure is good if some interested parties and individuals take up their right and check what is going on. But they should do so in a responsible way. If they find something that angers them, you'd hope they do the sensible stuff and ask the club about it, via a EGM or otherwise. But not running to the media and reveal their findings, if any. Are you for real? That has been tried, hence where we are today. I will ignore the un-highlighted part of your post. It is staggering. The deceitful bunch of charlatans at our club think they are above the law and continually act as though they are above it. Never mind a down market red top, this should be top story on sky news and the financial times. Perhaps you should petition parliament to change the law? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,771 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Are you for real? That has been tried, hence where we are today. I will ignore the un-highlighted part of your post. It is staggering. The deceitful bunch of charlatans at our club think they are above the law and continually act as though they are above it. Never mind a down market red top, this should be top story on sky news and the financial times. Perhaps you should petition parliament to change the law? how have they broken the law ? prove they are charlatans please. SKY news & FT ? Petition parliament LOL. Please come into the real world. I suspect absolutely nothing will come of the police investigation into GW. As for this guy Billy Paterson what does he expect to achieve other than even more bad publicity for Rangers? Does he expect to uncover a whole new set of financial irregularities or such? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 The tone doesn't give me much confidence this is anything more than a cynical tactic 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 how have they broken the law ? prove they are charlatans please. SKY news & FT ? Petition parliament LOL. Please come into the real world.I suspect absolutely nothing will come of the police investigation into GW. As for this guy Billy Paterson what does he expect to achieve other than even more bad publicity for Rangers? Does he expect to uncover a whole new set of financial irregularities or such? Your first question, "how have they broken the law ?" They broke the law, yes. An investor and shareholder in the RIFC plc asked to see the directors contracts as laid down in section 229 of the companies act. Absolutely 100% within his rights and 100% entitled to see them. They have to be available at the registered office for company members to inspect. They told him to fuck off. That renders the rest of your post irrelevant. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.