Union of Fans Statement: 23/04/14

[TheTinMan99 0]

I thought that the idea was that the fans were to be given the security. I don't see this statement as tying in with this principle.

 

Who are the shareholders of the company? Just Dave King? So it will be a Dave King controlled company? It's one thing to ask the directors of the club to grant security of the stadium to "the fans". It's another to ask them to grant it to what appears to be just Dave King, and despite my respect for him and my feelings on the current board, that idea makes me feel very uncomfortable.

 

It's almost as if they don't want the security because they seem to setting it up to make it impossible for the board to do what they are asking.

 

Were you not just a few days ago commenting on how there is no company set up to administer such a scheme? Now they set one up, and it still doesn't sit right with you? Maybe you could expand on why Mr King being granted the security makes you feel "uncomfortable", because I'm sure you would rather our most valuable assets were under his control, than the staus quo.