Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I doubt Scottish players care about playing for Scotland. If you are Scottish, you get very little international career to speak of. I don't see a few qualifiers a year being a high priority on a player's career. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 i wholeheartedly disagree. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I doubt Scottish players care about playing for Scotland. If you are Scottish, you get very little international career to speak of. I don't see a few qualifiers a year being a high priority on a player's career. I see it that way myself but the footballers themselves probably don't 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Even pretending I agree with all that for a second, you really think McGregor et all were thinking how they were doing us a favour? It was greed and nothing more, Naismith and Whittaker even held a press conference to rub salt into the wound. How anyone could want that wee blonde rat back is beyond me. Yet you have no issues with Chuck's greed ? These guys at least gave us something in return. Dont give me the nonsense that Chuck saved us. He was a front who didnt put his hand in his pocket... but filled them on the ay out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Yet you have no issues with Chuck's greed ? These guys at least gave us something in return. Dont give me the nonsense that Chuck saved us. He was a front who didnt put his hand in his pocket... but filled them on the ay out. Deep down I think other folk are more in love with Charles than I am the way he keeps getting mentioned 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Deep down I think other folk are more in love with Charles than I am the way he keeps getting mentioned Hardly. More a case of you distancing yourself because it becomes ever more difficult to justify your stance 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 Hardly. More a case of you distancing yourself because it becomes ever more difficult to justify your stance I stand by my stance but it is a rather futile debate these days , he's long gone 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I stand by my stance but it is a rather futile debate these days , he's long gone Long gone (debatable) but his stench lives on 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I doubt green is far away 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 28, 2014 Share Posted March 28, 2014 I stand by my stance but it is a rather futile debate these days , he's long gone Which is that it was OK for Chuck to come in, have no real affinity to the club (despite his protestations), pocketed oodles of money for doing very little - and you are happy ? Compare and contrats with the players who actually contributed to title wins, were/are Bears and contributed greatly - you dont even want them back as spectators. Hopefully even you see the bipolar nature of what you are suggesting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.