Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

There's the difference between you and I, you consider it as only one isolated supporter, i consider as us all Rangers supporters together.
Nobody has sent me a lawyer's letter because I'm not daft enough to associate myself with slander, not sure why I should be dragged into it just because he's a fellow Rangers fan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody has sent me a lawyer's letter because I'm not daft enough to associate myself with slander, not sure why I should be dragged into it just because he's a fellow Rangers fan

 

He;s getting sued for comments on the SOS facebook page, as yet to be determined if he is legally responsible for those comments. That's why the RFFF might help in that defence. As yet he's done nothing wrong until the court decides, but you have him already guilty or liable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He;s getting sued for comments on the SOS facebook page, as yet to be determined if he is legally responsible for those comments. That's why the RFFF might help in that defence. As yet he's done nothing wrong until the court decides, but you have him already guilty or liable.

I've said that I'm happy to see what a court decides, maybe he's done nothing wrong. But it's between Easdale and Houston.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody has sent me a lawyer's letter because I'm not daft enough to associate myself with slander, not sure why I should be dragged into it just because he's a fellow Rangers fan

 

Talk about Easdale in the same manner you talk about Ally and see how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

from my understanding, the RFFF was setup to help the CLUB....

 

What IF the vote goes in favour of helping Mr Houston, then Mr Easdale wins???? The £200k goes straight into Mr Easdale's pocket - how does that help the club???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I call him a shite manager, I doubt Easdale is suing over him being called a shite director

 

Easdale can't defend being called a shite director, arguably the same way that Ally couldn't defend being called a shite manager. In light of this, easdale is suing on the back of personal insults, much in the same way that Ally could set his lawyer on you for calling him a c*nt. Both cases will/would probably be laughed out of court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easdale can't defend being called a shite director, arguably the same way that Ally couldn't defend being called a shite manager. In light of this, easdale is suing on the back of personal insults, much in the same way that Ally could set his lawyer on you for calling him a c*nt. Both cases will/would probably be laughed out of court.

 

C*nt and criminal probably has some difference in a legal sense.

 

And for the record again I shouldn't have said that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.