bluebear54 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Does anyone know if reported the alleged breach of the Data Protection Act to the Information Commissioner? I've not read anything BH. I'm surprised, as, if what was being put about is true, it was a no-brainer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I've not read anything BH.I'm surprised, as, if what was being put about is true, it was a no-brainer. And very easy to do as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 perhaps one side is trying to be sensible about all this. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue 64 57 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Can you show the rest of us mortals any evidence you have that Craig "choose to get on the wrong side of the law"? I'm just reading through this thread and it's the second time you have assumed the guy is guilty without any evidence and before a court case. Strange behaviour for a Rangers fan. He removed the offending posts which suggests he thinks he is guilty. The fact he then repeated them suggests he is not very smart and way out his depth. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 he removed them because he as asked to. perhaps he is just polite. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Think Wallace was the only board member there Indeed, so there wouldn't be much point in joining in with a chant about the upstanding transport tycoon if he wasn't actually there.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 He removed the offending posts which suggests he thinks he is guilty. The fact he then repeated them suggests he is not very smart and way out his depth. You contradict yourself with that answer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 He would have removed the posts because they were drawn to his attention. It is not a matter of guilt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 are we legally allowed to hate him? By all means. You have a few choices there. You can "hate" him. You could allegedly hate him. You could "think" that you hate him, since that is your opinion and not fact. Or in a quantum physics type of way, you could hate him, not hate him and also do both at the same time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 By all means. You have a few choices there.You can "hate" him. You could allegedly hate him. You could "think" that you hate him, since that is your opinion and not fact. Or in a quantum physics type of way, you could hate him, not hate him and also do both at the same time. Am I legally allowed to clap the notion that I hate him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.