Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Just what is Wallaces CV exactly though? He wasn't the main man at City and their books were not exactly in good shape when he was there either.

 

How long does it take to see that we don't need Cribaris, Perrys or Huttons sitting in the stands, we don't need a squad of 34 players, we don't need a manager on £400k a year or coaches on slightly less, we don't need to be paying media house and apparently one other media company to put out positive spin? Looks to me like they are just playing for more time. 120 days, what needed done could have been drawn up and action taken within a matter of hours.

 

One thing annoying me is we will have spent around £30m on the first team staff and squad by the time we get back to the SPL and still need to rebuild from top to bottom. For me, that is criminal. It's just completely needless imo. We have just gone about everything from day one all wrong.

 

Alarm bells should have went off in every Rangers fans heads when Charles Green admitted him, his consortium and board didn't have a clue about football.

 

I agree with you mate, the previous board and McCoist have really messed up our football and financial planning for these lower leagues. But I doubt the current regime can sort it over night, people are under contract for one. You can hardly blame Wallace for City's books considering their ownership regime, it's surely telling that even Paul Murray and Jim McColl were praising him?

 

Even if you're skeptical about the length of time put on it what's another 40 odd days really? Not everyone is another Craig Whyte secretly wrecking us in the background.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing i know about you personally is that you are a thoroughly decent fella who has a thing for Charles Green. What is it about the board that gets your vote mate?

 

Maybe the board have a thing for Chuck too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you mate, the previous board and McCoist have really messed up our football and financial planning for these lower leagues. But I doubt the current regime can sort it over night, people are under contract for one. You can hardly blame Wallace for City's books considering their ownership regime, it's surely telling that even Paul Murray and Jim McColl were praising him?

 

Even if you're skeptical about the length of time put on it what's another 40 odd days really? Not everyone is another Craig Whyte secretly wrecking us in the background.

 

I am not even sure it is tbh! :D

 

It's over a month, we've already had a couple of months, i think it's too long, it's a worry why Wallace wanted, or worse still needed, so long. Our problems have been staring us in the face for so long now, through 3 different ownerships in fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any doubt about it. Was our ownership consortium not put together by him?

 

That was meant to be my non-too well put point. "Why would STB not like such a board if he "has a thing for Green"? in other words. Your original question seemed to be answered in your own post, I thought.

 

Just ignore me, been a long day already!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.