barca72 440 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Any retreat on 1000 words? :devil: Keep your pen in your holster and save the rest of us from exposure to your drivel. Do you know Sandy Easdale personally? Do you know the man's literary capabilities, not just this misleadingly construed comment? Are you prepared to impinge on Sandy Easedale's sharpness, with or without a wormtongue association? Did you ever consider that your attempt at deprecating humour is unpalatable, and tiresome, to some bears? Dave King is introducing a kernel of optimism among the Rangers' support that finally this continual trial of fear and mistrust can come to an end, and you wish to grasp an opportunity to denigrate further the present board and/or its occupant(s). If Dave King is prepared to accept that Sandy Easdale's words were a misunderstanding, why can't you leave it at that and allow the process to heal where it can? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Keep your pen in your holster and save the rest of us from exposure to your drivel. Do you know Sandy Easdale personally? Do you know the man's literary capabilities, not just this misleadingly construed comment? Are you prepared to impinge on Sandy Easedale's sharpness, with or without a wormtongue association? Did you ever consider that your attempt at deprecating humour is unpalatable, and tiresome, to some bears? Dave King is introducing a kernel of optimism among the Rangers' support that finally this continual trial of fear and mistrust can come to an end, and you wish to grasp an opportunity to denigrate further the present board and/or its occupant(s). If Dave King is prepared to accept that Sandy Easdale's words were a misunderstanding, why can't you leave it at that and allow the process to heal where it can? Barca - chill, please. If you care to read posts #6,#7 and #8 again, I hope you see that Davie P and I were having a friendly poke at Andy. Nothing to do with Sandy Easdale or Dave King. It was about puns. I've previously posted about not underestimating the Board, and I certainly can't recall accusing anyone of being dense - on the forum or in real life. It's not my style. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Barca - chill, please. If you care to read posts #6,#7 and #8 again, I hope you see that Davie P and I were having a friendly poke at Andy.Nothing to do with Sandy Easdale or Dave King. It was about puns. I've previously posted about not underestimating the Board, and I certainly can't recall accusing anyone of being dense - on the forum or in real life. It's not my style. Bluebear that was not directed at you. You were asking if there was any reduction on the 1000 words , and that was my answer. It was directed at Andy's threat to write 3000 words deprecating Sandy Easdale. In my opinion it is time to unite and move on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Bluebear that was not directed at you. You were asking if there was any reduction on the 1000 words , and that was my answer. It was directed at Andy's threat to write 3000 words deprecating Sandy Easdale. In my opinion it is time to unite and move on. Apologies, bud. Totally agree with your sentiments on uniting and moving on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Keep your pen in your holster and save the rest of us from exposure to your drivel. Do you know Sandy Easdale personally? Do you know the man's literary capabilities, not just this misleadingly construed comment? Are you prepared to impinge on Sandy Easedale's sharpness, with or without a wormtongue association? Did you ever consider that your attempt at deprecating humour is unpalatable, and tiresome, to some bears? Dave King is introducing a kernel of optimism among the Rangers' support that finally this continual trial of fear and mistrust can come to an end, and you wish to grasp an opportunity to denigrate further the present board and/or its occupant(s). If Dave King is prepared to accept that Sandy Easdale's words were a misunderstanding, why can't you leave it at that and allow the process to heal where it can? There is an ignore function, you know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Well this escalated quickly 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.