RANGERRAB 3,872 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Regards DK's statement all the board are warning is be careful you don't end up with nothing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Regards DK's statement all the board are warning is be careful you don't end up with nothing. I think they're concerned that they end up with nothing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,872 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I think they're concerned that they end up with nothing. Why won't deep pockets Dave buy a shareholding of 10 to 15 percent ? The board will have to talk to him then. He can afford it I'm sure 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 This happened before the current board got in . Just throwing around baseless accusations ?And what uses did you disapprove of? Were Laxey, Easdales, BHP and Margarita not always involved, from day one? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Why won't deep pockets Dave buy a shareholding of 10 to 15 percent ? The board will have to talk to him then. He can afford it I'm sure That mob wouldn't listen to him unless he had them by the short and curlies. There's not enough shares available for him to do that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Why won't deep pockets Dave buy a shareholding of 10 to 15 percent ? The board will have to talk to him then. He can afford it I'm sure Someone has to be willing to sell first, no? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanGers193 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Pretty pathetic that that's all they could come up with although I do agree with what they say. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The board notes Mr King’s comments with concern as they are potentially de-stabilising and damaging to Rangers Football Club. YOU, 'the board' as the current occupants of the Rangers boardroom are "de-stabilising and damaging" the Club more than anyone by treating the fans and shareholders as mugs. The club is already so unstable and damaged, that it's difficult to see how someone like Dave King who ultimately wishes to rectify the situation can do much more "de-stabilising and damaging" than what's already been done. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Spunking away £22m is a pretty de-stabilising and damaging thing to do to Rangers Football Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Spunking away £22m is a pretty de-stabilising and damaging thing to do to Rangers Football Club. It's more than that though, is it not? First 6 months accounts turnover plus annual accounts turnover plus the IPO funds and less than two years later we are needing a loan. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.