Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

You mentioned follow follow not me.

 

Yes, I did. I mentioned it because, in my opinion, it seems to be one of the stupid reasons people 'chose sides' instead of actually examining the facts that were staring them in the face.

 

I thought we were talking about board members hence why I pointed to Wallace's CV, now you've said it's about the shareholders. Fair enough, but as I say, when it comes to forcing change only cold hard cash will do it there.

 

Did you. I thought we were talking about that section of our support who shamefully acted as cheerleaders for the people who've led us back to the abyss. You know, the ones that don't take responsibility for their words or actions. Wallace will do his master's bidding, that's how it usually works with employees. Again, you shouldn't need to be an accountant to understand that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is then?

 

Take your pick. Laxey are the biggest shareholders by quite a way and probably have at least one man on the board while obviously there's the block of 24% who handed their proxy votes to Sandy Easdale and by default his brother too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.