compo 7,357 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 should be interesting 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,886 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 who would buy? Why would they dilute the already diluted share value? I ask because I have no knowledge of such things If they have a share issue with money going straight to the club, not some investors (like now?), e.g. King has said that he would invest. Especially now, if the share price is low (and thus attractive for a club that has definite CL potential). Of course, if as some stated, there is a final say by Blue Pitch, Margarita et al on such matters, they might object to a share issue. Hence my question whether they actually have the power. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,737 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 The chances are that if we were to get the information, the names would mean nothing to us anyway and we would be no further forward. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crucible 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 The legal position is more than clear, it is an embarrassment that the reqs are reduced to repeating old nonsense. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 It's quite simple. Don't give money to people you don't know. This has served me well throughout life. Maybe that will speed up the naming process. If they choose to use emotional blackmail to part us from our hard earned. That should be enough to tell us that something isn't quite right. Our club isn't a faceless supermarket, where nobody cares who's pulling the strings. Anonymity isn't an option at Rangers. The support should make this clear. It stinks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 It's quite simple. Don't give money to people you don't know. This has served me well throughout life. Maybe that will speed up the naming process. If they choose to use emotional blackmail to part us from our hard earned. That should be enough to tell us that something isn't quite right. Our club isn't a faceless supermarket, where nobody cares who's pulling the strings. Anonymity isn't an option at Rangers. The support should make this clear. It stinks. Of course it stinks, but who among us cared when Chuckie-boy lifted us out of the liquidation mire and gave us life? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Of course it stinks, but who among us cared when Chuckie-boy lifted us out of the liquidation mire and gave us life? I am Spartacus! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Of course it stinks, but who among us cared when Chuckie-boy lifted us out of the liquidation mire and gave us life? Plenty of us, that were drowned out by the majority. It baffles me to this day how so many fell for his pish. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Plenty of us, that were drowned out by the majority. It baffles me to this day how so many fell for his pish. What could you have done about it? Organized a boycott? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 What could you have done about it? Organized a boycott? There was a pretty effective de facto one that took place at the time was there not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.