RFC Statement: Disappointed with Lawwell

[BEARGER 1,830]

How is it too late to be defending our club against lies?

 

I was meaning too late to win round the fans. For whats it's worth I doubt very much if our present board will go in hard on this. They should be asking for his removal from his SFA position, how can the SFA have someone like him in a senior opinion who insults a member club? Time will tell but I have no faith in our board.

[amms 0]

Lawwell is a classless oaf playing to the gallery. Tims will lap that kind of shite up, but the CEO of Celtic should be above that kind of comment.

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on. Ultimately who gives a fuck what Lawwell or anyone at Celtic thinks.

[simplythebest 0]

Lawwell is a classless oaf playing to the gallery. Tims will lap that kind of shite up, but the CEO of Celtic should be above that kind of comment.

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on. Ultimately who gives a fuck what Lawwell or anyone at Celtic thinks.

 

Disagree wholeheartedly, we need to challenge these lies at every turn or it will look like we're accepting they're right.

[bossy 0]

I was meaning too late to win round the fans. For whats it's worth I doubt very much if our present board will go in hard on this. They should be asking for his removal from his SFA position, how can the SFA have someone like him in a senior opinion who insults a member club? Time will tell but I have no faith in our board.

 

The Board seem to have statement 'diarrhea' at the moment.

 

However, going after Lawwell hard would certainly work in their favour should they choose to do so.

 

Maybe Lawwell wants to see the current board in place rather than a more effective one. Maybe 'toxic Jack' put him up to it.

 

Conspiracy Theory Loyal

[ian1964 10,723]

Lawwell is a classless oaf playing to the gallery. Tims will lap that kind of shite up, but the CEO of Celtic should be above that kind of comment.

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on. Ultimately who gives a fuck what Lawwell or anyone at Celtic thinks.

 

To be fair though,he is in a position of authority and should not be speaking like this,same with any mHedia outlets,we will continue to get that thrown at us from opposing fans and it won't anger me in the slightest,I'm sure that goes for most Rangers fans?,but he is out of order for saying it as is any of the mHedia.

[barca72 440]

Lawwell is a classless oaf playing to the gallery. Tims will lap that kind of shite up, but the CEO of Celtic should be above that kind of comment.

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on. Ultimately who gives a fuck what Lawwell or anyone at Celtic thinks.

 

It's not about a thicker skin, Amms. They want us to draw a line under the past, but they keep pushing their bullshit. It's time to call him to task, especially as Bearger says 'He's a member of the SFA board and should be representing all clubs, not insulting them.'

[BEARGER 1,830]

The Board seem to have statement 'diarrhea' at the moment.

 

However, going after Lawwell hard would certainly work in their favour should they choose to do so.

 

Maybe Lawwell wants to see the current board in place rather than a more effective one. Maybe 'toxic Jack' put him up to it.

 

Conspiracy Theory Loyal

 

Your taking it too far:)

[Zappa 0]

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on.

 

It's just fishing (as we call it online), but on a larger scale designed to bait the masses.

 

We've been getting bombarded with it constantly for years and yet we keep chomping the hell out of the hook and providing entertainment for them.

 

It now goes right to the top with Regan, Lawwell & co at the SFA literally taking the piss, but it's been going on for years now with certain people at Pacific Quay and others in the Scottish media just sticking a piece of bait on a hook for our fans to fight over.

 

It's now a constant and the only real variations are in which particular person or people are doing the fishing and the tackle used on their regular outings.

 

[Zappa 0]

You sure you're not letting your overall views of the board, Irvine etc cloud your judgement?

 

One hundred percent sure.

[barca72 440]

It's just fishing (as we call it online), but on a larger scale designed to bait the masses.

 

We've been getting bombarded with it constantly for years and yet we keep chomping the hell out of the hook and providing entertainment for them.

 

It now goes right to the top with Regan, Lawwell & co at the SFA literally taking the piss, but it's been going on for years now with certain people at Pacific Quay and others in the Scottish media just sticking a piece of bait on a hook for our fans to fight over.

 

It's now a constant and the only real variations are in which particular person or people are doing the fishing and the tackle used on their regular outings.

 

 

That's fine, but do you think we should allow this unlicenced fishing to continue unabated or do you think we should pushback in some fashion?