Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Daily Express saying AGM Wed 18th Dec

It is understood Wednesday, December 18 has been fixed as the date for the long-awaited AGM. But fans want to know why there is such a delay, given that Rangers were preparing for an October 24 date.

 

The Jim McColl-Paul Murray group had to go to the Court of Session to force a postponement to include the nomination of four new directors – Paul Murray, Malcolm Murray, Alex Wilson and Scott Murdoch.

 

However, fans are angered that it has taken so long to fix a new date, with Rangers Supporters’ Assembly president Andy Kerr saying: “We’ve been saying for weeks that the meeting needs to be held as quickly as possible, but now it’s going to drag on again.

 

“It’s certainly not helpful and the frustrating aspect is the club was preparing for an October 24 meeting, so why is it taking so long for the rearranged meeting to take place?

 

“If a useful explanation was given, fans and shareholders might understand. But it now seems like prevarication.

 

“All this will do is create more angst and uncertainty between now and the meeting.”

 

Meanwhile, former Rangers chairman Malcolm Murray has warned the club’s mystery shareholders they could be blocked from voting at the AGM unless they reveal their backers.

 

Fans have concerns over two shareholder groups – Blue Pitch Holdings and Margarita Holdings – and fear they may be a front for former chief executive Charles Green or even disgraced ex-owner Craig Whyte.

 

Murray is adamant that, unless Blue Pitch and Margarita, who have around a 12 per cent stake in the club, reveal their backers, Rangers’ institutional shareholders could bar their votes.

 

He said: “In terms of institutions, we do know who the major shareholders are. They are very shy, retiring people. They are Hargreave Hale, Artemis, Reverend Mercantile, Miton, Kames Capital and Laxey Partners.

 

“But if you’re getting after who the mystery shareholders are, the original shareholders brought in by Charles Green, I was told, wealthy Arabs who were quite secretive about their identity.

 

“I’ve met representatives many times over the last few months. They seemed quite reasonable until Charles Green left and then they became very aggressive, and supported the changes on the board which saw me and Phil Cartmell leave and the Easdales coming on.

 

“We don’t know why they changed their mind. All we know is their nominee name, which is Blue Pitch/Margarita, and accounts for about 12 per cent of the holding. We’ve demanded to know who they are but we’ve not been told.

 

“But the big stick we have is that if they won’t tell us, the institutions can demand to know who they are. And if they won’t tell us, those shares won’t get a vote. If there’s nothing to hide, why on earth won’t we be told?”

 

Murray insists the Ibrox club has huge potential if the bitter boardroom power struggle can be ended.

 

He said: “Rangers are gigantic. One of the reasons I was asked to be chairman by the institutions was I was Manchester United’s biggest shareholder.

 

“When I bought a quarter of United, it was almost exactly the same size are Rangers are now. And it has turned out to be a giant global brand.

 

“If you put Rangers and Celtic together, the globalisation is fantastic. We’re acting as a domestic brand. But these are genuinely global.”

 

 

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/footb...ting-AGM-delay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Santa,

 

Forget the scalextric, remote control helictopter or the xbox I wrote to you about last week ........................

 

I'd now like the Easdales and Stockbridge OUT for Xmas please.

 

Yours sincerely,

The People

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but on the bright side it could be a very Merry X-mas and a very happy new year.

 

Possibly but it may not be as simple as that.

 

For example, I don't doubt that Murray et al will be voted onto the board while Stockbridge may not. However, if that does happen that will only end up with another EGM requisition from BPH etc.

 

This has a way to go yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly but it may not be as simple as that.

 

For example, I don't doubt that Murray et al will be voted onto the board while Stockbridge may not. However, if that does happen that will only end up with another EGM requisition from BPH etc.

 

This has a way to go yet.

 

 

given bph had such a low chance of success with their last egm request i doubt they will fair better last time. cenkos had them at about 12% of the votes with 44% against.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.