chilledbear 16 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/5443-club-statement 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 seems it has already affected the quality of website article. a victim of toxic jack no doubt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted November 1, 2013 Author Share Posted November 1, 2013 seems it has already affected the quality of website article. a victim of toxic jack no doubt. Keep them short from now on I think. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 I fear the damage & carnage this individual will unleash without JT there to reign him in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Not sure what he did bar a few OTT blog style opinionated articles on the official website which Green had him put out to cater to the masses. Hopefully he gets back on the radio because that was something tangible he did and was enjoyable to listen to. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
amms 0 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 I wonder if he's got a confidentiality clause. be some book if he doesn't. I worried that Traynor would become the story when he joined and he did to an extent but I think he improved some of our output and from what I hear was a force for good inside the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 Seemingly it's a cost cutting exercise, no laughing at the back!! Rangers board's spokesman says, "Directors are looking at a range of cost-cutting measures. Jim #Traynor's departure is part of that." 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 I wonder if he's got a confidentiality clause. be some book if he doesn't. I worried that Traynor would become the story when he joined and he did to an extent but I think he improved some of our output and from what I hear was a force for good inside the club. I can't see anything he did. Was he not Director of Communications? He presided over the most embarrassing PR the club has ever seen so how you say things improved I do not know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 No surprise, when Walter walked his days were numbered. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
amms 0 Posted November 1, 2013 Share Posted November 1, 2013 I can't see anything he did. Was he not Director of Communications? He presided over the most embarrassing PR the club has ever seen so how you say things improved I do not know. I think you are confusing that role with a PR role. His remit was to improve Rangers owned media channels - the Programme, Rangers TV and website - so they could make more revenue. I've no idea if they did make more revenue but the quality on them improved, in my opinion. I'd add that you've no idea if he improved our PR or not, you only know what did get reported, not what didn't. Think about it, almost all the bad stuff we generate and supply to the media ourselves. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.