calscot 0 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 so what's the rivizi article about then? It seems to be all about someone who wants to sling mud at Rangers by phoning some phone number believing it belonged to a wanted criminal, being told it's a wrong number and being hung up on, then publishing this "insightful" information as some kind of evidence that everything about Rangers is abnormal and criminal. That's pretty much all we got from him. There may be more to it but you could only take that from the innuendo at best. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 I bow to your undoubted expertise on dull and soporific but where the Companies Act diverges from your own musings is in the fact it is both factual and law. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 It seems to be all about someone who wants to sling mud at Rangers by phoning some phone number believing it belonged to a wanted criminal, being told it's a wrong number and being hung up on, then publishing this "insightful" information as some kind of evidence that everything about Rangers is abnormal and criminal. That's pretty much all we got from him. There may be more to it but you could only take that from the innuendo at best. The inference seemed obvious to me. Heyho 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.