Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

i know he's no chuck green but lets not rewrite history just because toxic is whipping up a storm on rm

 

http://www.empireofthekop.com/anfield/2010/10/13/maybe-i-was-wrong-about-christian-purslow/

 

Voting those owners off suited him.

 

Not many compliments in here. http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=265016.0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voting those owners off suited him.

 

Not many compliments in here. http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=265016.0

 

 

voting them off saved the club from admin and suited all liverpool fans.

 

 

looks positive to me. especially on the financial front.

 

the main gripe seems to be getting rid of rafa benitez. not sure why thats a bad thing personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon Art,

 

I was wondering what you said there about Whyte.

 

Slightly off topic but I'm just curious,

 

Do you think The SFA are missing a trick in not helping Rangers rid themselves of that scumbag ? if indeed he is still connected or are there rules to make sure the SFA are not seen to be favouring The Rangers ?

 

Or is the SFA right up there on the list of Rangers haters, I know it may seem like an obvious question but I'm sure you get my point.

 

I would be surprised, forget that shocked more like if it was revealed that the person behind either of those companies was Whyte.

 

Dont forget Night Owl they (The SFA) have also stated they were happy to accept the conclusions of the Pinsent Mason investigation re alleged links between Whyte & Green which determined they could find no link between the two of them - if the SFA had accepted that knowing Whyte was behind either Blue Pitch or Margarita then their position would be simply untenable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

voting them off saved the club from admin and suited all liverpool fans.

 

 

looks positive to me. especially on the financial front.

 

the main gripe seems to be getting rid of rafa benitez. not sure why thats a bad thing personally.

Interesting you insist he saved Liverpool but insist Green's consortium didn't save us.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting you insist he saved Liverpool but insist Green's consortium didn't save us.

 

oh he did. so he could get rich.

 

my point has always been that he deserves no credit for his get rich quick plan. if he hadn't someone else would have and things could scarce be worse just now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.