j1mgg 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 And they wonder why the sales of papers are declining. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Mr English has not come out of this well. His recent attack on Walter Smith was just the arrival point in a journey he's been on for some time. Since then, he's made little or no attempt at objectivity. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 It's clearly aimed at Irvine, not at King "It's clearly aimed at Irvine" - Nobody has disputed that. "Not at King" - That is clearly your opinion - pure and simple. My opinion is that he is clearly also using this article as a vehicle to get points across about King (which are clearly his views as well). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 I agree that he sets out to aim at The Source i.e. Irvine, but half of the article is aimed toward King and obviously trying to get a groundswell of anti-King propaganda drummed up in the process (while at the same time Richard Wilson writes "contrary to others' beliefs the SFA and AIM will not oppose Dave King"). I understand he is [not too] cleverly trying to put the views across as Irvine's views about King, but make no mistake about it they are his views as well, which he is trying to mask in the fashion of this 'humour'. seems to me it's irvine thats anti king. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 My opinion is that he is clearly also using this article as a vehicle to get points across about King (which are clearly his views as well). King represents the opportunity of a generation for Rangers. Tom disnae like that. Tom disnae like that at all. Tom will be doing what he has been bidden to do by his employer or his bank account. Stir up as much shite as he can, no matter how contrived or invented. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 seems to me it's irvine thats anti king. I agree 100%. The point I am making is that they both are and English is disguising his own views in this piece. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 i think he is just telling you what is going on with irvine but in a way thats not actionable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 i think he is just telling you what is going on with irvine but in a way thats not actionable. And all the while Mr English is totally impartial on Mr King returning? I don't think so. Read between the lines of his 'article'. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 I agree that he sets out to aim at The Source i.e. Irvine, but half of the article is aimed toward King and obviously trying to get a groundswell of anti-King propaganda drummed up in the process (while at the same time Richard Wilson writes "contrary to others' beliefs the SFA and AIM will not oppose Dave King"). I understand he is [not too] cleverly trying to put the views across as Irvine's views about King, but make no mistake about it they are his views as well, which he is trying to mask in the fashion of this 'humour'. English article is penned in such a way that wherever he fires his bile disguised as humour, he hits a target. Inference that Rangers fans are threatening, King is toxic, toxic Jack toxicity level has risen, Easdales are being manipulated etc. It leads the reader to think that Rangers and it's support need being dealt with by the various anti-Rangers establishment again. Or am i being to paranoid? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 And all the while Mr English is totally impartial on Mr King returning? I don't think so. Read between the lines of his 'article'. i think your reading the wrong in between lines. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.