Mather takes £300K with him!

[Bluedell 5,899]

Irrelevant if it was succeeded by a permanent contract; as you have already said 12 months notice is normal for a CEO at this level.

 

Unless he was caught with his hand in the till, I don't see that sacking him as BD suggests was a realistic option.

 

The point about the interim appointment was just to highlight the gravy train mentality prevalent in the board. Mather confirmed that the board had subsequently gone through a selection process and decided he was the best candidate. If they had found someone better then presumably he would have got a £600K pay-off. As for the argument that he was also COO, we appear to have managed without a separate one since his permanent appointment. The whole thing stinks.

 

Green was sacked for gross misconduct but still got a full pay-out so there is every reason to think that Mather would have got the same, no matter his offence. We don't know why he was sacked but this board have been proven to give each other cash rather than looking to save the company money.

[j1mgg 0]

both sides? there is only one side rangers side

 

 

There is not just one side and that is pretty clear even from just in here

 

Pro PM

Pro board

Anti PM

Anti board

Don't want any of the buggers

 

Then there is people that just want to go and watch the football.

 

Everyone wants what they think is best for rangers, just that different people have different opinions on what they think that is.

[Frankie 8,839]

 

Everyone wants what they think is best for rangers, just that different people have different opinions on what they think that is.

 

Well said!

 

It's a real shame that a few people have forgotten about this in their haste to moan about each other via the daily divisive nonsense we see on some forums.

 

We just need to keep it simple. There are clear issues with the board of the club - that much is obvious from the bonus culture, the poor financial results, the dreadful PR function and the lack of overall clarity. No need to go after person A or B - just make the point for improvement until we get it. That's why an open AGM was so necessary and I'd have thought even PM's biggest critics would appreciate that as it gives them a chance to keep him out.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

As I say one side. Rangers.